"Everyone's using it, but no one is allowed to talk about it": College Students' Experiences Navigating the Higher Education Environment in a Generative AI World
Higher education students are increasingly using generative AI in their academic work. However, existing institutional practices have not yet adapted to this shift. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 college students, our study examines the environmental and social factors that influence students' use of AI. Findings show that institutional pressure factors like deadlines, exam cycles, and grading lead students to engage with AI even when they think it undermines their learning. Social influences, particularly peer micro-communities, establish de-facto AI norms regardless of official AI policies. Campus-wide ``AI shame'' is prevalent, often pushing AI use underground. Current institutional AI policies are perceived as generic, inconsistent, and confusing, resulting in routine noncompliance. Additionally, students develop value-based self-regulation strategies, but environmental pressures create a gap between students' intentions and their behaviors. Our findings show student AI use to be a situated practice, and we discuss implications for institutions, instructors, and system tool designers to effectively support student learning with AI.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Wisdom and Foolishness of Noisy Matching Markets
We consider a many-to-one matching market where colleges share true preferences over students but make decisions using only independent noisy rankings. Each student has a true value $v$, but each college $c$ ranks the st…
AN INTERNSHIP REPORT ON STUDENT FEEDBACK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT
The aim of the study was to develop a World Wide Web-based course feedback system serving both students and teachers. The system includes generation and analysis of course feedback pages, provision of feedback, and a sum…
ManagementStudent feedback management system project report
The aim of the study was to develop a World Wide Web-based course feedback system serving both students and teachers. The system includes generation and analysis of course feedback pages, provision of feedback, and a s…
ManagementDownstream Effects of Affirmative Action
We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college…
FairnessVocal Bursts Type PredictionAttachment Styles and AI Chatbot Interactions Among College Students
The use of large language model (LLM)-based AI chatbots among college students has increased rapidly, yet little is known about how individual psychological attributes shape students' interaction patterns with these tech…