Position: Explain to Question not to Justify
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is a young but very promising field of research. Unfortunately, the progress in this field is currently slowed down by divergent and incompatible goals. We separate various threads tangled within the area of XAI into two complementary cultures of human/value-oriented explanations (BLUE XAI) and model/validation-oriented explanations (RED XAI). This position paper argues that the area of RED XAI is currently under-explored, i.e., more methods for explainability are desperately needed to question models (e.g., extract knowledge from well-performing models as well as spotting and fixing bugs in faulty models), and the area of RED XAI hides great opportunities and potential for important research necessary to ensure the safety of AI systems. We conclude this paper by presenting promising challenges in this area.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Explainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)PositionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
On the Injunction of XAIxArt
The position paper highlights the range of concerns that are engulfed in the injunction of explainable artificial intelligence in art (XAIxArt). Through a series of quick sub-questions, it points towards the ambiguities …
Explainable artificial intelligencePositionAttentive Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence
Deep models are the defacto standard in visual decision models due to their impressive performance on a wide array of visual tasks. However, they are frequently seen as opaque and are unable to explain their decisions. I…
Decision MakingQuestion AnsweringSentenceVisual Question Answering+1Measurement of Global Value Chain (GVC) Participation in World Development Report 2020
As we can understand with the spread of GVCs, a lot of new questions emerge regarding the measurement of participation and positioning in the globalised production process. The World Development Report (WDR) 2020 explain…
Justifying Answer Sets using Argumentation
An answer set is a plain set of literals which has no further structure that would explain why certain literals are part of it and why others are not. We show how argumentation theory can help to explain why a literal is…
Argument Schemes and Dialogue for Explainable Planning
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly deployed in practical applications. However, there is a major concern whether AI systems will be trusted by humans. In order to establish trust in AI systems, there is a…