paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Flex-Judge: Think Once, Judge Anywhere

2025-05-24 · Jongwoo Ko, Sungnyun Kim, Sungwoo Cho, Se-Young Yun

Human-generated reward signals are critical for aligning generative models with human preferences, guiding both training and inference-time evaluations. While large language models (LLMs) employed as proxy evaluators, i.e., LLM-as-a-Judge, significantly reduce the costs associated with manual annotations, they typically require extensive modality-specific training data and fail to generalize well across diverse multimodal tasks. In this paper, we propose Flex-Judge, a reasoning-guided multimodal judge model that leverages minimal textual reasoning data to robustly generalize across multiple modalities and evaluation formats. Our core intuition is that structured textual reasoning explanations inherently encode generalizable decision-making patterns, enabling an effective transfer to multimodal judgments, e.g., with images or videos. Empirical results demonstrate that Flex-Judge, despite being trained on significantly fewer text data, achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art commercial APIs and extensively trained multimodal evaluators. Notably, Flex-Judge presents broad impact in modalities like molecule, where comprehensive evaluation benchmarks are scarce, underscoring its practical value in resource-constrained domains. Our framework highlights reasoning-based text supervision as a powerful, cost-effective alternative to traditional annotation-intensive approaches, substantially advancing scalable multimodal model-as-a-judge.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2505.18601

Code (1)

jongwooko/flex-judge 공식 구현 pytorch

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks

2025-07-14 · Hongchao Jiang, Yiming Chen, Yushi Cao, Hung-Yi Lee 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the state-of-the-art in various coding tasks. Beyond directly answering user queries, LLMs can also serve as judges, assessing and comparing the quality of respons…

BenchmarkingCode GenerationCode Repair

Prejudge-Before-Think: Enhancing Large Language Models at Test-Time by Process Prejudge Reasoning

2025-04-18 · Jianing Wang, Jin Jiang, Yang Liu, Mengdi Zhang 외

In this paper, we introduce a new \emph{process prejudge} strategy in LLM reasoning to demonstrate that bootstrapping with process prejudge allows the LLM to adaptively anticipate the errors encountered when advancing th…

Reinforcement Learning (RL)

AI Can Learn Scientific Taste

2026-03-15 · Jingqi Tong, Mingzhe Li, Hangcheng Li, Yongzhuo Yang 외 arxiv

Scientific discovery depends on expert judgement and foresight, which we call scientific taste: the ability to judge and propose research ideas with the potential for long-term scientific impact. Scientific taste is larg…

Reinforcement Learning

Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-Judge

2025-05-20 · Hui Huang, Yancheng He, Hongli Zhou, Rui Zhang 외

LLM-as-a-Judge refers to the automatic modeling of preferences for responses generated by Large Language Models (LLMs), which is of significant importance for both LLM evaluation and reward modeling. Although generative …

Offline RLReinforcement Learning (RL)

Explicit Reasoning Makes Better Judges: A Systematic Study on Accuracy, Efficiency, and Robustness

2025-09-09 · Pratik Jayarao, Himanshu Gupta, Neeraj Varshney, Chaitanya Dwivedi arxiv

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as automated judges in benchmarking and reward modeling, ensuring their reliability, efficiency, and robustness has become critical. In this work, we present a sys…

Computational EfficiencyFew-Shot Learning