Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights Imply Inconsistent Comparisons of Tax Policies
This paper concerns Saez and Stantcheva's (2016) generalized social marginal welfare weights, which aggregate losses and gains due to tax policies, while incorporating non-utilitarian ethical considerations. The approach evaluates local tax changes without a global social objective. I show that local tax policy comparisons implicitly entail global comparisons. Moreover, whenever welfare weights do not have a utilitarian structure, these implied global comparisons are inconsistent. I argue that broader ethical values cannot in general be represented simply by modifying the weights placed on benefits to different people, and a more thoroughgoing modification of the utilitarian approach is required.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Socially Fair Reinforcement Learning
We consider the problem of episodic reinforcement learning where there are multiple stakeholders with different reward functions. Our goal is to output a policy that is socially fair with respect to different reward func…
reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams
We propose generalized versions of strong equity and Pigou-Dalton transfer principle. We study the existence and the real valued representation of social welfare relations satisfying these two generalized equity principl…
RelationWelfare Analysis via Marginal Treatment Effects
Consider a causal structure with endogeneity (i.e., unobserved confoundedness) in empirical data, where an instrumental variable is available. In this setting, we show that the mean social welfare function can be identif…
Demand and Welfare Analysis in Discrete Choice Models with Social Interactions
Many real-life settings of consumer-choice involve social interactions, causing targeted policies to have spillover-effects. This paper develops novel empirical tools for analyzing demand and welfare-effects of policy-in…
counterfactualDiscrete Choice ModelsEconometrics"Near" Weighted Utilitarian Characterizations of Pareto Optima
We characterize Pareto optimality via "near" weighted utilitarian welfare maximization. One characterization sequentially maximizes utilitarian welfare functions using a finite sequence of nonnegative and eventually posi…