paper-with-me

Papers

HarnessDev: Can LLMs Create and Evolve Their Own Agent Harness?

2026-09-01 · Yuhao Wu, Jingyuan Zhang, Jiajun Shi, Xinping Lei, Qingshui Gu, Yuxuan Zhang, Zexuan Wang, Chen He, Chen Huang, Maojia Song, Zhiyuan Zeng, Shaowen Wang, Jinkai Liu, Yunfeng Shi, Jiaheng Liu, Shen Yan, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang, Wenxuan Zhang hf

As agents move from research prototypes to deployed tools, their capability increasingly depends on model-external execution infrastructure, commonly termed the agent harness. Changing this harness while holding model weights fixed can substantially alter task performance. Current agent evaluations typically report downstream performance under a chosen harness, leaving a model's ability to develop the harness itself comparatively underexplored. We introduce HarnessDev, a benchmark that shifts the unit of evaluation from task outputs to runnable infrastructure. HarnessDev covers two stages. In Creation, the agent starts from a minimal seed and a small number of cases, then builds a complete execution system. In Evolution, it starts from its own created harness and iteratively revises it using downstream execution feedback, with the goal of improving benchmark performance. We then evaluate each constructed harness on capability (task success on held-out benchmarks) and efficiency (execution-token cost). The reported Creation results cover six creator LLMs, four domains, and five downstream benchmarks totaling 2,207 unique downstream instances, with hidden evaluation tasks withheld from development. We find that generated harnesses remain substantially behind mature human-engineered references on code and on search and research, while matching or exceeding the selected references on writing and machine-learning experimentation, with large variation in execution cost. Evolution produces some performance gains, but they are unstable and transfer only partially to held-out tasks. Experiments with a fixed runtime model further show that the gains depend strongly on the model executing the harness, indicating limited transfer across models.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2609.01437

Code (1)

Valiant-Cat/hfpaper

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

AgentEvolver: Towards Efficient Self-Evolving Agent System

2025-11-13 · Yunpeng Zhai, Shuchang Tao, Cheng Chen, Anni Zou 외 arxiv

Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have the potential to significantly enhance human productivity by reasoning, using tools, and executing complex tasks in diverse environments. However, current ap…

Reinforcement Learning

Agent Hospital: A Simulacrum of Hospital with Evolvable Medical Agents

2024-05-05 · Junkai Li, Yunghwei Lai, Weitao Li, Jingyi Ren 외

The recent rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has sparked a new wave of technological revolution in medical artificial intelligence (AI). While LLMs are designed to understand and generate text like a huma…

MedQAQuestion Answering

Multi-Agent Evolve: LLM Self-Improve through Co-evolution

2025-10-27 · Yixing Chen, Yiding Wang, Siqi Zhu, Haofei Yu 외 arxiv

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated significant potential in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the success of RL for LLMs heavily relies on human-curated datasets and…

Reinforcement LearningGeneral Knowledge

BENCHAGENTS: Automated Benchmark Creation with Agent Interaction

2024-10-29 · Natasha Butt, Varun Chandrasekaran, Neel Joshi, Besmira Nushi 외

Evaluations are limited by benchmark availability. As models evolve, there is a need to create benchmarks that can measure progress on new generative capabilities. However, creating new benchmarks through human annotatio…

DiversityText Generation

Automating Benchmark Design

2025-10-28 · Amanda Dsouza, Harit Vishwakarma, Zhengyang Qi, Justin Bauer 외 arxiv

The rapid progress and widespread deployment of LLMs and LLM-powered agents has outpaced our ability to evaluate them. Hand-crafted, static benchmarks are the primary tool for assessing model capabilities, but these quic…