How Wrong Can Your Counterfactual Be? Quantifying Confounding Bias for Continuous Treatments without a Control Group
Stress testing poses a causal question: how would portfolio credit losses change if the macroeconomy followed an adverse counterfactual path? Yet standard practice remains predictive and might be therefore vulnerable to omitted-variable bias. We propose a partial identification framework for causal stress testing in panel data with a continuous common treatment and no control group. By assuming that the unobserved confounder affects outcome and macro variables additively, we derive a closed-form confounding envelope parameterized by two interpretable sensitivity parameters. We further analyze two practical estimators -- recursive rollout and direct multi-horizon prediction -- derive non-asymptotic error bounds, and characterize when recursive compounding makes direct estimation preferable. For inference, we combine the identification envelope with importance-weighted conformal prediction, yielding finite-sample intervals that separate estimation uncertainty from identification uncertainty under covariate shift. In semi-synthetic experiments built from real U.S. unemployment paths, standard high-accuracy predictive models remain causally biased and substantially under-cover, whereas the proposed framework achieves near-nominal coverage across stress horizons.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
On Counterfactual Data Augmentation Under Confounding
Counterfactual data augmentation has recently emerged as a method to mitigate confounding biases in the training data. These biases, such as spurious correlations, arise due to various observed and unobserved confounding…
counterfactualData AugmentationDebiased Counterfactual Generation via Flow Matching from Observations
Estimating counterfactual distributions under interventions is central to treatment risk assessment and counterfactual generation tasks. Existing approaches model the counterfactual distribution as a standalone generativ…
De-confounding Representation Learning for Counterfactual Inference on Continuous Treatment via Generative Adversarial Network
Counterfactual inference for continuous rather than binary treatment variables is more common in real-world causal inference tasks. While there are already some sample reweighting methods based on Marginal Structural Mod…
Causal InferencecounterfactualCounterfactual InferenceGenerative Adversarial Network+1DoubleGen: Debiased Generative Modeling of Counterfactuals
Generative models for counterfactual outcomes face two key sources of bias. Confounding bias arises when approaches fail to account for systematic differences between those who receive the intervention and those who do n…
The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confounding
Causal approaches to fairness have seen substantial recent interest, both from the machine learning community and from wider parties interested in ethical prediction algorithms. In no small part, this has been due to the…
counterfactualFairnessSensitivity