Improving LLMs via Validator-to-Generator Alignment
Large language models are inconsistent: varying prompts or including unrelated information can lead to unexpected changes in model outputs. The generator-validator (G-V) gap is one manifestation of this phenomenon, where LLMs generate responses that they then deem as invalid if re-queried to validate them. In this work, we introduce a new formulation of G-V consistency that involves a principled correction for utterance frequency. Specifically, generators often assign low likelihood to valid strings simply because those strings are a priori unlikely, which makes naive notions of G-V consistency unworkable. We show that under a natural model of rational agents answering questions with multiple answers, consistency of the validator with a frequency-corrected generator score emerges naturally. Our method, \emph{\FCPAname} (\FCPA), is a training objective implementing frequency-corrected G-V consistency for real-world LLMs. Our experimental results show that training with \FCPA{} substantially improves both G-V consistency and generator performance over prior methods, with gains of up to $+27$pp in Pearson correlation on IFEval and HumanEval, while preserving validator quality across all evaluated tasks.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
RankAlign: A Ranking View of the Generator-Validator Gap in Large Language Models
Although large language models (LLMs) have become generally more capable and accurate across many tasks, some fundamental sources of unreliability remain in their behavior. One key limitation is their inconsistency at re…
Question AnsweringBenchmarking and Improving Generator-Validator Consistency of Language Models
As of September 2023, ChatGPT correctly answers "what is 7+8" with 15, but when asked "7+8=15, True or False" it responds with "False". This inconsistency between generating and validating an answer is prevalent in langu…
BenchmarkingInstruction FollowingMathWhen and Why Test Generators for Deep Learning Produce Invalid Inputs: an Empirical Study
Testing Deep Learning (DL) based systems inherently requires large and representative test sets to evaluate whether DL systems generalise beyond their training datasets. Diverse Test Input Generators (TIGs) have been pro…
validCalibrating Verbalized Confidence with Self-Generated Distractors
Calibrated confidence estimates are necessary for large language model (LLM) outputs to be trusted by human users. While LLMs can express their confidence in human-interpretable ways, verbalized LLM-generated confidence …
Ishigaki-IDS: An Open-Weight Verifier-Aware Model for Information Delivery Specification Drafting in Building Information Modeling
Building Information Modeling (BIM) projects require information requirements to be described as machine-checkable Information Delivery Specification (IDS) files in order to verify whether building models contain the req…
Reinforcement Learning