paper-with-me

Papers

Improving LLMs via Validator-to-Generator Alignment

2026-07-02 · Juan Diego Rodriguez, Jocelyn Zhang, Katrin Erk, Greg Durrett arxiv

Large language models are inconsistent: varying prompts or including unrelated information can lead to unexpected changes in model outputs. The generator-validator (G-V) gap is one manifestation of this phenomenon, where LLMs generate responses that they then deem as invalid if re-queried to validate them. In this work, we introduce a new formulation of G-V consistency that involves a principled correction for utterance frequency. Specifically, generators often assign low likelihood to valid strings simply because those strings are a priori unlikely, which makes naive notions of G-V consistency unworkable. We show that under a natural model of rational agents answering questions with multiple answers, consistency of the validator with a frequency-corrected generator score emerges naturally. Our method, \emph{\FCPAname} (\FCPA), is a training objective implementing frequency-corrected G-V consistency for real-world LLMs. Our experimental results show that training with \FCPA{} substantially improves both G-V consistency and generator performance over prior methods, with gains of up to $+27$pp in Pearson correlation on IFEval and HumanEval, while preserving validator quality across all evaluated tasks.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.02668

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

RankAlign: A Ranking View of the Generator-Validator Gap in Large Language Models

2025-04-15 · Juan Diego Rodriguez, Wenxuan Ding, Katrin Erk, Greg Durrett

Although large language models (LLMs) have become generally more capable and accurate across many tasks, some fundamental sources of unreliability remain in their behavior. One key limitation is their inconsistency at re…

Question Answering

Benchmarking and Improving Generator-Validator Consistency of Language Models

2023-10-03 · Xiang Lisa Li, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Siyan Li, Tatsunori Hashimoto 외

As of September 2023, ChatGPT correctly answers "what is 7+8" with 15, but when asked "7+8=15, True or False" it responds with "False". This inconsistency between generating and validating an answer is prevalent in langu…

BenchmarkingInstruction FollowingMath

When and Why Test Generators for Deep Learning Produce Invalid Inputs: an Empirical Study

2022-12-21 · Vincenzo Riccio, Paolo Tonella

Testing Deep Learning (DL) based systems inherently requires large and representative test sets to evaluate whether DL systems generalise beyond their training datasets. Diverse Test Input Generators (TIGs) have been pro…

valid

Calibrating Verbalized Confidence with Self-Generated Distractors

2025-09-29 · Victor Wang, Elias Stengel-Eskin arxiv

Calibrated confidence estimates are necessary for large language model (LLM) outputs to be trusted by human users. While LLMs can express their confidence in human-interpretable ways, verbalized LLM-generated confidence …

Ishigaki-IDS: An Open-Weight Verifier-Aware Model for Information Delivery Specification Drafting in Building Information Modeling

2026-06-07 · Ryo Kanazawa, Koyo Hidaka, Teppei Miyamoto, Takayuki Kato 외 arxiv

Building Information Modeling (BIM) projects require information requirements to be described as machine-checkable Information Delivery Specification (IDS) files in order to verify whether building models contain the req…

Reinforcement Learning