paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Improving Score Reliability of Multiple Choice Benchmarks with Consistency Evaluation and Altered Answer Choices

2025-11-26 · Paulo Cavalin, Cassia Sanctos, Marcelo Grave, Claudio Pinhanez, Yago Primerano arxiv

In this work we present the Consistency-Rebalanced Accuracy (CoRA) metric, improving the reliability of Large Language Model (LLM) scores computed on multiple choice (MC) benchmarks. Our metric explores the response consistency of the LLMs, taking advantage of synthetically-generated questions with altered answer choices. With two intermediate scores, i.e. Bare-Minimum-Consistency Accuracy (BMCA) and Consistency Index (CI), CoRA is computed by adjusting the multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) scores to better reflect the level of consistency of the LLM. We present evaluations in different benchmarks using diverse LLMs, and not only demonstrate that LLMs can present low response consistency even when they present high MCQA scores, but also that CoRA can successfully scale down the scores of inconsistent models.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.21860

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Grade Score: Quantifying LLM Performance in Option Selection

2024-06-17 · Dmitri Iourovitski

This study introduces the "Grade Score", a novel metric designed to evaluate the consistency and fairness of Large Language Models (LLMs) when used as multiple-choice judges with respect to order bias and choice consiste…

Decision MakingFairnessInstruction FollowingMultiple-choice+1

Assessing the Reliability of Word Embedding Gender Bias Measures

2021-09-10 · EMNLP 2021 11 · Yupei Du, Qixiang Fang, Dong Nguyen

Various measures have been proposed to quantify human-like social biases in word embeddings. However, bias scores based on these measures can suffer from measurement error. One indication of measurement quality is reliab…

Word Embeddings

Improving LLM First-Token Predictions in Multiple-Choice Question Answering via Prefilling Attack

2025-05-21 · Silvia Cappelletti, Tobia Poppi, Samuele Poppi, Zheng-Xin Yong 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated on multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) tasks using *first-token probability* (FTP), which selects the answer option whose initial token has the highest likeli…

Multiple-choiceMultiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA)Question Answeringvalid

RCScore: Quantifying Response Consistency in Large Language Models

2025-10-30 · Dongjun Jang, Youngchae Ahn, Hyopil Shin arxiv

Current LLM evaluations often rely on a single instruction template, overlooking models' sensitivity to instruction style-a critical aspect for real-world deployments. We present RCScore, a multi-dimensional framework qu…

SCORE: Systematic COnsistency and Robustness Evaluation for Large Language Models

2025-02-28 · Grigor Nalbandyan, Rima Shahbazyan, Evelina Bakhturina

Typical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) report a single metric per dataset, often representing the model's best-case performance under carefully selected settings. Unfortunately, this approach overlooks model…

MMLU