Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labels
Recently, fairness-aware learning have become increasingly crucial, but most of those methods operate by assuming the availability of fully annotated demographic group labels. We emphasize that such assumption is unrealistic for real-world applications since group label annotations are expensive and can conflict with privacy issues. In this paper, we consider a more practical scenario, dubbed as Algorithmic Group Fairness with the Partially annotated Group labels (Fair-PG). We observe that the existing methods to achieve group fairness perform even worse than the vanilla training, which simply uses full data only with target labels, under Fair-PG. To address this problem, we propose a simple Confidence-based Group Label assignment (CGL) strategy that is readily applicable to any fairness-aware learning method. CGL utilizes an auxiliary group classifier to assign pseudo group labels, where random labels are assigned to low confident samples. We first theoretically show that our method design is better than the vanilla pseudo-labeling strategy in terms of fairness criteria. Then, we empirically show on several benchmark datasets that by combining CGL and the state-of-the-art fairness-aware in-processing methods, the target accuracies and the fairness metrics can be jointly improved compared to the baselines. Furthermore, we convincingly show that CGL enables to naturally augment the given group-labeled dataset with external target label-only datasets so that both accuracy and fairness can be improved. Code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/cgl_fairness.
Code (1)
Tasks
FairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
From Soft Classifiers to Hard Decisions: How fair can we be?
A popular methodology for building binary decision-making classifiers in the presence of imperfect information is to first construct a non-binary "scoring" classifier that is calibrated over all protected groups, and the…
Decision MakingFairnessBayes-Optimal Fair Classification with Multiple Sensitive Features
Existing theoretical work on Bayes-optimal fair classifiers usually considers a single (binary) sensitive feature. In practice, individuals are often defined by multiple sensitive features. In this paper, we characterize…
AttributeClassificationFairnessIdentifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning
Datasets often contain biases which unfairly disadvantage certain groups, and classifiers trained on such datasets can inherit these biases. In this paper, we provide a mathematical formulation of how this bias can arise…
BIG-bench Machine LearningFairnessTowards A Scalable Solution for Improving Multi-Group Fairness in Compositional Classification
Despite the rich literature on machine learning fairness, relatively little attention has been paid to remediating complex systems, where the final prediction is the combination of multiple classifiers and where multiple…
FairnessTraining CNN Classifiers for Semantic Segmentation using Partially Annotated Images: with Application on Human Thigh and Calf MRI
Objective: Medical image datasets with pixel-level labels tend to have a limited number of organ or tissue label classes annotated, even when the images have wide anatomical coverage. With supervised learning, multiple c…
Semantic Segmentation