paper-with-me

Papers

Learning to Make MISTAKEs: Modeling Incorrect Student Thinking And Key Errors

2025-10-13 · Alexis Ross, Jacob Andreas arxiv

Research on reasoning in language models (LMs) predominantly focuses on improving the correctness of their outputs. But some important applications require modeling reasoning patterns that are incorrect. For example, automated systems that can reason about and simulate student errors are useful for providing real-time feedback in the classroom or offline practice for educators-in-training. This paper presents a new method, MISTAKE, that (1) constructs high-quality synthetic examples of reasoning errors by leveraging cycle consistency between incorrect answers and latent misconceptions; and (2) uses the generated data to learn models for student simulation, misconception classification, and answer generation. We evaluate MISTAKE on three educational tasks and find that it results in (1) higher accuracy when simulating incorrect student answers based on specific misconceptions, (2) increased performance inferring latent misconceptions from observed incorrect answers, and (3) higher alignment with expert-written distractor answers when generating incorrect answers (e.g., for multiple-choice tests).

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.11502

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Answer Generation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Do LLMs Make Mistakes Like Students? Exploring Natural Alignment between Language Models and Human Error Patterns

2025-02-21 · Naiming Liu, Shashank Sonkar, Richard G. Baraniuk

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various educational tasks, yet their alignment with human learning patterns, particularly in predicting which incorrect options students are most …

Distractor GenerationMultiple-choice

Mistake Captioning: A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Mistakes and Generating Instructive Feedback

2021-09-01 · RANLP 2021 9 · Anton Vinogradov, Andrew Miles Byrd, Brent Harrison

Giving feedback to students is not just about marking their answers as correct or incorrect, but also finding mistakes in their thought process that led them to that incorrect answer. In this paper, we introduce a machin…

Finding Common Mistakes In Modelling With Mathematical Formalisms Using LLMs

2026-09-15 · Lilian Killich, Marko Schmellenkamp, Fabian Vehlken, Thomas Zeume arxiv

Modelling with mathematical formalisms like logical formulas, mathematical equations, or regular expressions is an important yet challenging task for students of computer science and other STEM disciplines. Identifying c…

How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball

2023-05-22 · Muru Zhang, Ofir Press, William Merrill, Alisa Liu 외

A major risk of using language models in practical applications is their tendency to hallucinate incorrect statements. Hallucinations are often attributed to knowledge gaps in LMs, but we hypothesize that in some cases, …

HallucinationLanguage ModelingLanguage Modellingmodel+1

Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoning

2024-03-29 · Yongqi Tong, Dawei Li, Sizhe Wang, Yujia Wang 외

Recent works have shown the benefits to LLMs from fine-tuning golden-standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales or using them as correct examples in few-shot prompting. While humans can indeed imitate correct examples, l…