Localizing Input Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models via Shapley Values
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making, the ability to reliably quantify uncertainty has become a critical requirement for safety and trust. However, current uncertainty quantification methods primarily operate at the output level, often failing to distinguish whether uncertainty arises from the model's lack of knowledge or from ambiguity in the user's input. While input-centric uncertainty quantification has recently emerged as a promising direction, it remains relatively underexplored and typically relies on coarse, input-level information. Consequently, users are provided with scalar uncertainty scores that offer little actionable guidance on which parts of the input should be clarified to improve reliability. To address this limitation, we propose Shapley-based input uncertainty Quantification (ShaQ), a framework for span-level attribution of input-induced uncertainty. Our approach models ambiguous spans in the input as players in a cooperative game and quantifies their contributions using Shapley values, defined via the weighted average of marginal reductions in conditional entropy obtained by clarifying each span coalition. Unlike existing input-level approaches, our formulation captures complex interactions among spans and provides a principled decomposition in which individual attributions sum exactly to the total input-induced uncertainty. We evaluate ShaQ on the AmbigQA and AmbiEnt benchmarks, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance in ambiguity detection. We further demonstrate its utility on MediTOD, showing that ShaQ can localize under-specified clinical utterances and facilitate human-AI collaboration in high-stakes settings. Overall, ShaQ improves uncertainty estimation and provides actionable insights for targeted input clarification.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Inv-Entropy: A Fully Probabilistic Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but their reliable deployment requires effective uncertainty quantification (UQ). Existing UQ methods are often heuristic and lack a probabilisti…
DiversitySemantic SimilaritySemantic Textual SimilarityUncertainty QuantificationQuestion Rephrasing for Quantifying Uncertainty in Large Language Models: Applications in Molecular Chemistry Tasks
Uncertainty quantification enables users to assess the reliability of responses generated by large language models (LLMs). We present a novel Question Rephrasing technique to evaluate the input uncertainty of LLMs, which…
PredictionProperty PredictionUncertainty QuantificationFunctional-level Uncertainty Quantification for Calibrated Fine-tuning on LLMs
Accurate uncertainty quantification of large language models (LLMs) provides credibility measure over their outputs. However, fine-tuned LLMs often struggle with overconfidence in uncertain predictions due to the limitat…
Common Sense ReasoningMixture-of-Expertsparameter-efficient fine-tuningUncertainty QuantificationUncertainty Quantification and Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models: A Survey
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text generation, reasoning, and decision-making, enabling their adoption in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and transportation. However, their reliability is a major con…
Computational EfficiencyDecision MakingText GenerationUncertainty QuantificationSimple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification
Large language models (LLMs) often behave inconsistently across inputs, indicating uncertainty and motivating the need for its quantification in high-stakes settings. Prior work on calibration and uncertainty quantificat…