paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Loss-Versus-Rebalancing under Deterministic and Generalized block-times

2025-05-08 · Alex Nezlobin, Martin Tassy

Although modern blockchains almost universally produce blocks at fixed intervals, existing models still lack an analytical formula for the loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) incurred by Automated Market Makers (AMMs) liquidity providers in this setting. Leveraging tools from random walk theory, we derive the following closed-form approximation for the per block per unit of liquidity expected LVR under constant block time: \[ \overline{\mathrm{ARB}}= \frac{\,\sigma_b^{2}} {\,2+\sqrt{2\pi}\,\gamma/(|\zeta(1/2)|\,\sigma_b)\,}+O\!\bigl(e^{-\mathrm{const}\tfrac{\gamma}{\sigma_b}}\bigr)\;\approx\; \frac{\sigma_b^{2}}{\,2 + 1.7164\,\gamma/\sigma_b}, \] where $\sigma_b$ is the intra-block asset volatility, $\gamma$ the AMM spread and $\zeta$ the Riemann Zeta function. Our large Monte Carlo simulations show that this formula is in fact quasi-exact across practical parameter ranges. Extending our analysis to arbitrary block-time distributions as well, we demonstrate both that--under every admissible inter-block law--the probability that a block carries an arbitrage trade converges to a universal limit, and that only constant block spacing attains the asymptotically minimal LVR. This shows that constant block intervals provide the best possible protection against arbitrage for liquidity providers.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2505.05113

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

LVR Method introduces a novel unlabeled debiasing technique which works on classification task to reduce the bias of the transformer based language models on downstream classification…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Rebalancing-versus-Rebalancing: Improving the fidelity of Loss-versus-Rebalancing

2024-10-30 · Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) hold assets and are constantly being rebalanced by external arbitrageurs to match external market prices. Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is a pivotal metric for measuring how an AMM pool per…

Asset ManagementManagement

Model-free Hedging of Impermanent Loss in Geometric Mean Market Makers

2023-03-20 · Masaaki Fukasawa, Basile Maire, Marcus Wunsch

We consider Geometric Mean Market Makers -- a special type of Decentralized Exchange -- with two types of users: liquidity takers and arbitrageurs. Liquidity takers trade at prices that can create arbitrage opportunities…

Automated Market Making and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing

2022-08-11 · Jason Milionis, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Tim Roughgarden, Anthony Lee Zhang

We consider the market microstructure of automated market makers (AMMs) from the perspective of liquidity providers (LPs). Our central contribution is a ``Black-Scholes formula for AMMs''. We identify the main adverse se…

Impermanent loss and Loss-vs-Rebalancing II

2025-02-06 · Abe Alexander, Guillaume Lambert, Lars Fritz

This paper examines the relationship between impermanent loss (IL) and loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) in automated market makers (AMMs). Our main focus is on statistical properties, the impact of fees, the role of block t…

Impermanent loss and loss-vs-rebalancing I: some statistical properties

2024-10-01 · Abe Alexander, Lars Fritz

There are two predominant metrics to assess the performance of automated market makers and their profitability for liquidity providers: 'impermanent loss' (IL) and 'loss-versus-rebalance' (LVR). In this short paper we sh…

Sentence