paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Managed Autonomy at Runtime: Gear-Based Safety and Governance for Single- and Multi-Agent Cyber-Physical Systems

2026-07-01 · Srini Ramaswamy, Wang Miaosheng arxiv

Autonomous agents, whether LLM-driven software agents or robotic physical agents, face a common class of failure modes when operating without continuous human oversight: safety violations from unverified actions, behavioral instability from unconstrained loops, and continuity loss from unhandled error states. We develop \system{}, a discrete-time control system that combines five execution gears (\Gobs{}, \Gsug{}, \Gplan{}, \Gexec{}, \Gint{}) with utility-gated dispatch and event-driven fallback. For the single-agent case, we prove monotonic stability, execution safety, eventual stabilization, fallback completeness, and equivalence to a gear-constrained Markov decision process. For multi-agent cyber-physical systems (CPS), we apply the established \smart{} managed-autonomy lifecycle and map runtime evidence into its four governance states (\Stable{}/\Meta{}/\Assisted{}/\Regulated{}). Consensus gating, swarm-level Lyapunov analysis, per-agent gear authority, and rendezvous control provide distributed safety and stability guarantees, including zero collision under the stated assumptions. We evaluate the resulting runtime on a three-agent UR5 robotic assembly cell using fault magnitudes calibrated from the NIST \emph{Degradation Measurement of Robot Arm Position Accuracy} dataset across 10,000 Monte Carlo episodes. It achieves a 99.6\% anomaly detection rate versus 2.1\% for the single-agent baseline, reduces detection latency by $3.5\times$, and supplies a formal physical-workspace safety certificate. The execution gears act as micro-level permissions beneath the \smart{} runtime governance states, separating action control from autonomy governance.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.00334

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Anomaly Detection

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems

2026-05-26 · Srini Ramaswamy arxiv

As autonomous and agentic AI systems scale in robotic and human-machine environments, managing hallucination and persistent but unjustified action remains an open challenge. Rather than attributing these failures solely …

Rethinking Autonomy: Preventing Failures in AI-Driven Software Engineering

2025-08-15 · Satyam Kumar Navneet, Joydeep Chandra arxiv

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into software engineering has revolutionized code generation, enabling unprecedented productivity through promptware and autonomous AI agents. However, this transformation …

Prompt EngineeringCode Generation

From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines

2026-05-08 · Marcus Emmanuel Barnes, Taher A. Ghaleb, Safwat Hassan arxiv

AI agents are assuming active roles in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) workflows, yet the research community lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what it means for CI/CD to be agentic, how mu…

Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems

2026-06-02 · Zexun Wang arxiv

Agent systems execute through runtimes with very different control points: local coding tools, framework SDKs, managed agent platforms, API gateways, and observer-only integrations. A high-risk action such as publishing …

Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective

2025-02-20 · Krti Tallam

As artificial intelligence scales, the concepts of alignment, agency, and autonomy have become central to AI safety, governance, and control. However, even in human contexts, these terms lack universal definitions, varyi…

Decision MakingPhilosophy