Measuring the Effect of Background on Classification and Feature Importance in Deep Learning for AV Perception
Common approaches to explainable AI (XAI) for deep learning focus on analyzing the importance of input features on the classification task in a given model: saliency methods like SHAP and GradCAM are used to measure the impact of spatial regions of the input image on the classification result. Combined with ground truth information about the location of the object in the input image (e.g., a binary mask), it is determined whether object pixels had a high impact on the classification result, or whether the classification focused on background pixels. The former is considered to be a sign of a healthy classifier, whereas the latter is assumed to suggest overfitting on spurious correlations. A major challenge, however, is that these intuitive interpretations are difficult to test quantitatively, and hence the output of such explanations lacks an explanation itself. One particular reason is that correlations in real-world data are difficult to avoid, and whether they are spurious or legitimate is debatable. Synthetic data in turn can facilitate to actively enable or disable correlations where desired but often lack a sufficient quantification of realism and stochastic properties. [...] Therefore, we systematically generate six synthetic datasets for the task of traffic sign recognition, which differ only in their degree of camera variation and background correlation [...] to quantify the isolated influence of background correlation, different levels of camera variation, and considered traffic sign shapes on the classification performance, as well as background feature importance. [...] Results include a quantification of when and how much background features gain importance to support the classification task based on changes in the training domain [...]. Download: synset.de/datasets/synset-signset-ger/background-effect
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Traffic Sign RecognitionFeature ImportanceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Measuring Implicit Bias Using SHAP Feature Importance and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
In this paper, we integrate the concepts of feature importance with implicit bias in the context of pattern classification. This is done by means of a three-step methodology that involves (i) building a classifier and tu…
FairnessFeature ImportanceInterpreting Neural Networks With Nearest Neighbors
Local model interpretation methods explain individual predictions by assigning an importance value to each input feature. This value is often determined by measuring the change in confidence when a feature is removed. Ho…
Feature ImportanceGeneral Classificationtext-classificationText ClassificationFeature Importance Measurement based on Decision Tree Sampling
Random forest is effective for prediction tasks but the randomness of tree generation hinders interpretability in feature importance analysis. To address this, we proposed DT-Sampler, a SAT-based method for measuring fea…
Feature ImportanceInformation Importance-Aware Defense against Adversarial Attack for Automatic Modulation Classification:An XAI-Based Approach
Deep learning (DL) has significantly improved automatic modulation classification (AMC) by leveraging neural networks as the feature extractor.However, as the DL-based AMC becomes increasingly widespread, it is faced wit…
Adversarial AttackClassificationExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests
This paper proposes a method for measuring conditional feature importance via generative modeling. In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), conditional feature importance assesses the impact of a feature on a predic…
Explainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Feature Importance