paper-with-me

Papers

Mitigating Class Boundary Label Uncertainty to Reduce Both Model Bias and Variance

2020-02-23 · Matthew Almeida, Wei Ding, Scott Crouter, Ping Chen

The study of model bias and variance with respect to decision boundaries is critically important in supervised classification. There is generally a tradeoff between the two, as fine-tuning of the decision boundary of a classification model to accommodate more boundary training samples (i.e., higher model complexity) may improve training accuracy (i.e., lower bias) but hurt generalization against unseen data (i.e., higher variance). By focusing on just classification boundary fine-tuning and model complexity, it is difficult to reduce both bias and variance. To overcome this dilemma, we take a different perspective and investigate a new approach to handle inaccuracy and uncertainty in the training data labels, which are inevitable in many applications where labels are conceptual and labeling is performed by human annotators. The process of classification can be undermined by uncertainty in the labels of the training data; extending a boundary to accommodate an inaccurately labeled point will increase both bias and variance. Our novel method can reduce both bias and variance by estimating the pointwise label uncertainty of the training set and accordingly adjusting the training sample weights such that those samples with high uncertainty are weighted down and those with low uncertainty are weighted up. In this way, uncertain samples have a smaller contribution to the objective function of the model's learning algorithm and exert less pull on the decision boundary. In a real-world physical activity recognition case study, the data presents many labeling challenges, and we show that this new approach improves model performance and reduces model variance.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2002.09963

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Activity RecognitionClassificationGeneral Classification

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to Geometric Sampling for Active Learning

2018-05-31 · Xiaofeng Cao

Active learning (AL) repeatedly trains the classifier with the minimum labeling budget to improve the current classification model. The training process is usually supervised by an uncertainty evaluation strategy. Howeve…

Active LearningBoundary DetectionGeneral Classification

Improving Generalization via Uncertainty Driven Perturbations

2022-02-11 · Matteo Pagliardini, Gilberto Manunza, Martin Jaggi, Michael I. Jordan 외

Recently Shah et al., 2020 pointed out the pitfalls of the simplicity bias - the tendency of gradient-based algorithms to learn simple models - which include the model's high sensitivity to small input perturbations, as …

Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis

2026-05-11 · Junyu Lu, Deyi Ji, Xuanyi Liu, Lanyun Zhu 외 arxiv

Large language models for subjectivity analysis are typically trained with aggregated labels, which compress variations in human judgment into a single supervision signal. This paradigm overlooks the intrinsic uncertaint…

Subjectivity Analysis

PromptAL: Sample-Aware Dynamic Soft Prompts for Few-Shot Active Learning

2025-07-22 · Hui Xiang, Jinqiao Shi, Ting Zhang, Xiaojie Zhao 외 arxiv

Active learning (AL) aims to optimize model training and reduce annotation costs by selecting the most informative samples for labeling. Typically, AL methods rely on the empirical distribution of labeled data to define …

Active Learning

Incorporating Boundary Uncertainty into loss functions for biomedical image segmentation

2021-10-31 · Michael Yeung, Guang Yang, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb 외

Manual segmentation is used as the gold-standard for evaluating neural networks on automated image segmentation tasks. Due to considerable heterogeneity in shapes, colours and textures, demarcating object boundaries is p…

Image SegmentationSegmentationSemantic Segmentation