Modeling Melt Pool Features and Spatter Using Symbolic Regression and Machine Learning
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly evolving technology that has attracted applications across a wide range of fields due to its ability to fabricate complex geometries. However, one of the key challenges in AM is achieving consistent print quality. This inconsistency is often attributed to uncontrolled melt pool dynamics, partly caused by spatter which can lead to defects. Therefore, capturing and controlling the evolution of the melt pool is crucial for enhancing process stability and part quality. In this study, we developed a framework to support decision-making in AM operations, facilitating quality control and minimizing defects via machine learning (ML) and polynomial symbolic regression models. We implemented experimentally validated computational tools as a cost-effective approach to collect large datasets from laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) processes. For a dataset consisting of 281 process conditions, parameters such as melt pool dimensions (length, width, depth), melt pool geometry (area, volume), and volume indicated as spatter were extracted. Using machine learning (ML) and polynomial symbolic regression models, a high R2 of over 95 % was achieved in predicting the melt pool dimensions and geometry features for both the training and testing datasets, with either process conditions (power and velocity) or melt pool dimensions as the model inputs. In the case of volume indicated as spatter, R2 improved after logarithmic transforming the model inputs, which was either the process conditions or the melt pool dimensions. Among the investigated ML models, the ExtraTree model achieved the highest R2 values of 96.7 % and 87.5 %.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Symbolic RegressionMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Integrating Multi-Physics Simulations and Machine Learning to Define the Spatter Mechanism and Process Window in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has shown promise for wide range of applications due to its ability to fabricate freeform geometries and generate a controlled microstructure. However, components generated by LPBF still po…
In-Situ Infrared Camera Monitoring for Defect and Anomaly Detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Calibration, Data Mapping, and Feature Extraction
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process can incur defects due to melt pool instabilities, spattering, temperature increase, and powder spread anomalies. Identifying defects through in-situ monitoring typically requires co…
3D geometryAnomaly DetectionDefect DetectionInfluence of Spattering on In-process Layer Surface Roughness during Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) holds promise to efficiently produce metal parts. However, LPBF incurs stochastic melt pool (MP) spattering, which would roughen workpiece in-process surface, thus weakening inter-layer bon…
In-situ surface porosity prediction in DED (directed energy deposition) printed SS316L parts using multimodal sensor fusion
This study aims to relate the time-frequency patterns of acoustic emission (AE) and other multi-modal sensor data collected in a hybrid directed energy deposition (DED) process to the pore formations at high spatial (0.5…
Sensor FusionMeltpoolNet: Melt pool Characteristic Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Machine Learning
Characterizing meltpool shape and geometry is essential in metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) to control the printing process and avoid defects. Predicting meltpool flaws based on process parameters and powder material i…
ArticlesBenchmarkingBIG-bench Machine Learning