paper-with-me

Papers

Monotonic Neural Additive Models: Pursuing Regulated Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoring

2022-09-21 · Dangxing Chen, Weicheng Ye

The forecasting of credit default risk has been an active research field for several decades. Historically, logistic regression has been used as a major tool due to its compliance with regulatory requirements: transparency, explainability, and fairness. In recent years, researchers have increasingly used complex and advanced machine learning methods to improve prediction accuracy. Even though a machine learning method could potentially improve the model accuracy, it complicates simple logistic regression, deteriorates explainability, and often violates fairness. In the absence of compliance with regulatory requirements, even highly accurate machine learning methods are unlikely to be accepted by companies for credit scoring. In this paper, we introduce a novel class of monotonic neural additive models, which meet regulatory requirements by simplifying neural network architecture and enforcing monotonicity. By utilizing the special architectural features of the neural additive model, the monotonic neural additive model penalizes monotonicity violations effectively. Consequently, the computational cost of training a monotonic neural additive model is similar to that of training a neural additive model, as a free lunch. We demonstrate through empirical results that our new model is as accurate as black-box fully-connected neural networks, providing a highly accurate and regulated machine learning method.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2209.10070

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Additive modelsFairnessregression

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Logistic Regression Logistic Regression, despite its name, is a linear model for classification rather than regression. Logistic regression is also known in the literature as logit regression,…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Generalized Groves of Neural Additive Models: Pursuing transparent and accurate machine learning models in finance

2022-09-21 · Dangxing Chen, Weicheng Ye

While machine learning methods have significantly improved model performance over traditional methods, their black-box structure makes it difficult for researchers to interpret results. For highly regulated financial ind…

Additive modelsFairnessInterpretable Machine Learning

Logistic Ensemble Models

2018-06-12 · Bob Vanderheyden, Jennifer Priestley

Predictive models that are developed in a regulated industry or a regulated application, like determination of credit worthiness, must be interpretable and rational (e.g., meaningful improvements in basic credit behavior…

BIG-bench Machine LearningBinary Classification

Explaining Adverse Actions in Credit Decisions Using Shapley Decomposition

2022-04-26 · Vijayan N. Nair, Tianshu Feng, Linwei Hu, Zach Zhang 외

When a financial institution declines an application for credit, an adverse action (AA) is said to occur. The applicant is then entitled to an explanation for the negative decision. This paper focuses on credit decisions…

What's the Price of Monotonicity? A Multi-Dataset Benchmark of Monotone-Constrained Gradient Boosting for Credit PD

2025-12-14 · Petr Koklev arxiv

Financial institutions face a trade-off between predictive accuracy and interpretability when deploying machine learning models for credit risk. Monotonicity constraints align model behavior with domain knowledge, but th…

How to address monotonicity for model risk management?

2023-04-28 · Dangxing Chen, Weicheng Ye

In this paper, we study the problem of establishing the accountability and fairness of transparent machine learning models through monotonicity. Although there have been numerous studies on individual monotonicity, pairw…

Additive modelsFairnessManagement