Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation
In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various extension-based semantics. Given a framework with which explanations for argumentation-based conclusions can be derived, we study necessity and sufficiency: what (sets of) arguments are necessary or sufficient for the (non-)acceptance of an argument?
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Abstract ArgumentationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Change in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation: Sufficient, Necessary, and Counterfactual Explanations
This paper presents a formal approach to explaining change of inference in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). When drawing conclusions from a QBAF and updating the QBAF to then again draw conclusions …
Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions
In this paper we discuss contrastive explanations for formal argumentation - the question why a certain argument (the fact) can be accepted, whilst another argument (the foil) cannot be accepted under various extension-b…
Explaining Random Forests using Bipolar Argumentation and Markov Networks (Technical Report)
Random forests are decision tree ensembles that can be used to solve a variety of machine learning problems. However, as the number of trees and their individual size can be large, their decision making process is often …
Decision MakingCounterfactual and Semifactual Explanations in Abstract Argumentation: Formal Foundations, Complexity and Computation
Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Formal Argumentation have received significant attention in recent years. Argumentation-based systems often lack explainability while supporting decision-making processes. Counterf…
Abstract ArgumentationcounterfactualDecision MakingExplainable artificial intelligenceImproving Quality Assessment of Online Reviews UsingFormal Argumentation Theory and Knowledge Graphs
In this extended abstract, we introduce a previously developed framework for the assessment of the quality of product reviews by using formal argumentation theory and machine learning. Then, we outline current developme…
BIG-bench Machine LearningKnowledge Graphs