paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference

2024-05-31 · Xiaojin Zhang, Yahao Pang, Yan Kang, Wei Chen, Lixin Fan, Hai Jin, Qiang Yang

Individuals and businesses have been significantly benefited by Large Language Models (LLMs) including PaLM, Gemini and ChatGPT in various ways. For example, LLMs enhance productivity, reduce costs, and enable us to focus on more valuable tasks. Furthermore, LLMs possess the capacity to sift through extensive datasets, uncover underlying patterns, and furnish critical insights that propel the frontiers of technology and science. However, LLMs also pose privacy concerns. Users' interactions with LLMs may expose their sensitive personal or company information. A lack of robust privacy safeguards and legal frameworks could permit the unwarranted intrusion or improper handling of individual data, thereby risking infringements of privacy and the theft of personal identities. To ensure privacy, it is essential to minimize the dependency between shared prompts and private information. Various randomization approaches have been proposed to protect prompts' privacy, but they may incur utility loss compared to unprotected LLMs prompting. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the balance between the risk of privacy leakage and loss of utility when conducting effective protection mechanisms. The current study develops a framework for inferring privacy-protected Large Language Models (LLMs) and lays down a solid theoretical basis for examining the interplay between privacy preservation and utility. The core insight is encapsulated within a theorem that is called as the NFL (abbreviation of the word No-Free-Lunch) Theorem.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2405.20681

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Privacy Preserving

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음
PaLM 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

No Free Lunch Theorem for Security and Utility in Federated Learning

2022-03-11 · Xiaojin Zhang, Hanlin Gu, Lixin Fan, Kai Chen 외

In a federated learning scenario where multiple parties jointly learn a model from their respective data, there exist two conflicting goals for the choice of appropriate algorithms. On one hand, private and sensitive tra…

Federated LearningPrivacy Preserving

The Implications of the No-Free-Lunch Theorems for Meta-induction

2021-03-22 · David H. Wolpert

The important recent book by G. Schurz appreciates that the no-free-lunch theorems (NFL) have major implications for the problem of (meta) induction. Here I review the NFL theorems, emphasizing that they do not only conc…

There are free lunches

2021-09-29 · Zhuoran Xu, Hao liu, Bo Dong

No-Free-Lunch Theorems state that the performance of all algorithms is the same when averaged over all possible tasks. It has been argued that the necessary conditions for NFL are too restrictive to be found in practice.…

All

Free Lunch for Optimisation under the Universal Distribution

2016-08-16 · Tom Everitt, Tor Lattimore, Marcus Hutter

Function optimisation is a major challenge in computer science. The No Free Lunch theorems state that if all functions with the same histogram are assumed to be equally probable then no algorithm outperforms any other in…

No Free Lunch in "Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy"

2022-09-29 · Nicholas Carlini, Vitaly Feldman, Milad Nasr

New methods designed to preserve data privacy require careful scrutiny. Failure to preserve privacy is hard to detect, and yet can lead to catastrophic results when a system implementing a ``privacy-preserving'' method i…

Dataset CondensationPrivacy Preserving