No Free Lunch Theorem for Security and Utility in Federated Learning
In a federated learning scenario where multiple parties jointly learn a model from their respective data, there exist two conflicting goals for the choice of appropriate algorithms. On one hand, private and sensitive training data must be kept secure as much as possible in the presence of \textit{semi-honest} partners, while on the other hand, a certain amount of information has to be exchanged among different parties for the sake of learning utility. Such a challenge calls for the privacy-preserving federated learning solution, which maximizes the utility of the learned model and maintains a provable privacy guarantee of participating parties' private data. This article illustrates a general framework that a) formulates the trade-off between privacy loss and utility loss from a unified information-theoretic point of view, and b) delineates quantitative bounds of privacy-utility trade-off when different protection mechanisms including Randomization, Sparsity, and Homomorphic Encryption are used. It was shown that in general \textit{there is no free lunch for the privacy-utility trade-off} and one has to trade the preserving of privacy with a certain degree of degraded utility. The quantitative analysis illustrated in this article may serve as the guidance for the design of practical federated learning algorithms.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Federated LearningPrivacy PreservingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Trading Off Privacy, Utility and Efficiency in Federated Learning
Federated learning (FL) enables participating parties to collaboratively build a global model with boosted utility without disclosing private data information. Appropriate protection mechanisms have to be adopted to fulf…
Federated LearningVertical Federated LearningTowards Achieving Near-optimal Utility for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning via Data Generation and Parameter Distortion
Federated learning (FL) enables participating parties to collaboratively build a global model with boosted utility without disclosing private data information. Appropriate protection mechanisms have to be adopted to fulf…
Federated LearningPrivacy PreservingThe Implications of the No-Free-Lunch Theorems for Meta-induction
The important recent book by G. Schurz appreciates that the no-free-lunch theorems (NFL) have major implications for the problem of (meta) induction. Here I review the NFL theorems, emphasizing that they do not only conc…
No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference
Individuals and businesses have been significantly benefited by Large Language Models (LLMs) including PaLM, Gemini and ChatGPT in various ways. For example, LLMs enhance productivity, reduce costs, and enable us to focu…
Privacy PreservingThere are free lunches
No-Free-Lunch Theorems state that the performance of all algorithms is the same when averaged over all possible tasks. It has been argued that the necessary conditions for NFL are too restrictive to be found in practice.…
All