paper-with-me

Papers

Pathologist-like explainable AI for interpretable Gleason grading in prostate cancer

2024-10-19 · Gesa Mittmann, Sara Laiouar-Pedari, Hendrik A. Mehrtens, Sarah Haggenmüller, Tabea-Clara Bucher, Tirtha Chanda, Nadine T. Gaisa, Mathias Wagner, Gilbert Georg Klamminger, Tilman T. Rau, Christina Neppl, Eva Maria Compérat, Andreas Gocht, Monika Hämmerle, Niels J. Rupp, Jula Westhoff, Irene Krücken, Maximillian Seidl, Christian M. Schürch, Marcus Bauer, Wiebke Solass, Yu Chun Tam, Florian Weber, Rainer Grobholz, Jaroslaw Augustyniak, Thomas Kalinski, Christian Hörner, Kirsten D. Mertz, Constanze Döring, Andreas Erbersdobler, Gabriele Deubler, Felix Bremmer, Ulrich Sommer, Michael Brodhun, Jon Griffin, Maria Sarah L. Lenon, Kiril Trpkov, Liang Cheng, Fei Chen, Angelique Levi, Guoping Cai, Tri Q. Nguyen, Ali Amin, Alessia Cimadamore, Ahmed Shabaik, Varsha Manucha, Nazeel Ahmad, Nidia Messias, Francesca Sanguedolce, Diana Taheri, Ezra Baraban, Liwei Jia, Rajal B. Shah, Farshid Siadat, Nicole Swarbrick, Kyung Park, Oudai Hassan, Siamak Sakhaie, Michelle R. Downes, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Sean R. Williamson, Tim Holland-Letz, Carolin V. Schneider, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Yuri Tolkach, Titus J. Brinker

The aggressiveness of prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide, is primarily assessed based on histopathological data using the Gleason scoring system. While artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in accurately predicting Gleason scores, these predictions often lack inherent explainability, potentially leading to distrust in human-machine interactions. To address this issue, we introduce a novel dataset of 1,015 tissue microarray core images, annotated by an international group of 54 pathologists. The annotations provide detailed localized pattern descriptions for Gleason grading in line with international guidelines. Utilizing this dataset, we develop an inherently explainable AI system based on a U-Net architecture that provides predictions leveraging pathologists' terminology. This approach circumvents post-hoc explainability methods while maintaining or exceeding the performance of methods trained directly for Gleason pattern segmentation (Dice score: 0.713 $\pm$ 0.003 trained on explanations vs. 0.691 $\pm$ 0.010 trained on Gleason patterns). By employing soft labels during training, we capture the intrinsic uncertainty in the data, yielding strong results in Gleason pattern segmentation even in the context of high interobserver variability. With the release of this dataset, we aim to encourage further research into segmentation in medical tasks with high levels of subjectivity and to advance the understanding of pathologists' reasoning processes.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2410.15012

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Segmentation

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

ReLU How Do I Communicate to Expedia? How Do I Communicate to Expedia? – Call ☎️ +1-(888) 829 (0881) or +1-805-330-4056 or +1-805-330-4056 for Live Support & Special Travel…
Concatenated Skip Connection A Concatenated Skip Connection is a type of skip connection that seeks to reuse features by concatenating them to new layers, allowing more information to be retained from…
Convolution A convolution is a type of matrix operation, consisting of a kernel, a small matrix of weights, that slides over input data performing element-wise multiplication with the…
Max Pooling Max Pooling is a pooling operation that calculates the maximum value for patches of a feature map, and uses it to create a downsampled (pooled) feature map. It is usually…
U-Net 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Artificial Intelligence Assistance Significantly Improves Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies by Pathologists

2020-02-11 · Wouter Bulten, Maschenka Balkenhol, Jean-Joël Awoumou Belinga, Américo Brilhante 외

While the Gleason score is the most important prognostic marker for prostate cancer patients, it suffers from significant observer variability. Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, based on deep learning, have proven to…

Predicting Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality with A.I.-based Gleason Grading

2020-11-25 · Ellery Wulczyn, Kunal Nagpal, Matthew Symonds, Melissa Moran 외

Gleason grading of prostate cancer is an important prognostic factor but suffers from poor reproducibility, particularly among non-subspecialist pathologists. Although artificial intelligence (A.I.) tools have demonstrat…

ManagementOpen-Ended Question Answering

Gleason Score Prediction using Deep Learning in Tissue Microarray Image

2020-05-11 · Yi-Hong Zhang, Jing Zhang, Yang song, Chaomin Shen 외

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men around the world. The most accurate method to evaluate lesion levels of PCa is microscopic inspection of stained biopsy tissue and estimate the Gleason score…

Deep LearningSegmentation

Self-learning for weakly supervised Gleason grading of local patterns

2021-05-21 · Julio Silva-Rodríguez, Adrián Colomer, Jose Dolz, Valery Naranjo

Prostate cancer is one of the main diseases affecting men worldwide. The gold standard for diagnosis and prognosis is the Gleason grading system. In this process, pathologists manually analyze prostate histology slides u…

PrognosisSelf-Learningwhole slide images

Critical Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence as Digital Twin of Pathologist for Prostate Cancer Pathology

2023-08-23 · Okyaz Eminaga, Mahmoud Abbas, Christian Kunder, Yuri Tolkach 외

Prostate cancer pathology plays a crucial role in clinical management but is time-consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in detecting prostate cancer and grading patterns. We tested an AI-based digital twi…