Perspectives on Latent Factor Indeterminacy and its Implications for Data Representation
The common factor analytic model is related to Helmholtz and Boltzmann machines, can be conceived as a linear autoencoder, or can be thought of as a single-hidden-layer generative neural network. We thus consider it a basal generative representation learner that can be used as a minimal model for studying the foundational characteristics of (deep) generative model architectures. We focus on the fundamental problem of indeterminacy in latent factor projections. This indeterminacy implies that, even when the intrinsic dimension of the latent vector is known, regularity conditions are met, and rotational indeterminacy is resolved, an inherent indefiniteness in the retrieval of causative latent sources remains: they will be uncertain, distributionally deviant, and non-unique. This can have major implications for data representation but remains an elusive issue, even to practitioners and theorists well-versed in the factor model. Moreover, this classic psychometric problem is intricately related to the modern issue of latent variable collapse in the variational autoencoder framework for deep generative modeling. Here, we assess this indeterminacy from various perspectives and show how these are mathematically and conceptually related and we discuss subsequent implications for the Psychometrics, Statistics, and Artificial Intelligence communities. We show that one has latent factor determinacy across all its facets when the feature-dimension grows to infinity. This feeds into an essentially distribution-free estimation approach in the sample case when the number of features grows very large. We conclude, as these are emergent properties at scale, that the factor model is suited for representation learning of very-high-dimensional data.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Representation LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Perils of Label Indeterminacy: A Case Study on Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest
The design of AI systems to assist human decision-making typically requires the availability of labels to train and evaluate supervised models. Frequently, however, these labels are unknown, and different ways of estimat…
Decision MakingA Framework for Evaluating LLMs Under Task Indeterminacy
Large language model (LLM) evaluations often assume there is a single correct response -- a gold label -- for each item in the evaluation corpus. However, some tasks can be ambiguous -- i.e., they provide insufficient in…
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelStochastic Trajectory Prediction via Motion Indeterminacy Diffusion
Human behavior has the nature of indeterminacy, which requires the pedestrian trajectory prediction system to model the multi-modality of future motion states. Unlike existing stochastic trajectory prediction methods whi…
DiversityPedestrian Trajectory PredictionPredictionTrajectory PredictionFuzziness, Indeterminacy and Soft Sets: Frontiers and Perspectives
The present paper comes across the main steps that laid from Zadeh's fuzziness ana Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets to Smarandache's indeterminacy and to Molodstov's soft sets. Two hybrid methods for assessment and …
Decision MakingOn the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models
Linear causal models are important tools for modeling causal dependencies and yet in practice, only a subset of the variables can be observed. In this paper, we examine the parameter identifiability of these models by in…
parameter estimation