paper-with-me

Papers

Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers: Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Vision Foundation Models

2024-06-18 · Hengyi Wang, Shiwei Tan, Hao Wang

Vision transformers (ViTs) have emerged as a significant area of focus, particularly for their capacity to be jointly trained with large language models and to serve as robust vision foundation models. Yet, the development of trustworthy explanation methods for ViTs has lagged, particularly in the context of post-hoc interpretations of ViT predictions. Existing sub-image selection approaches, such as feature-attribution and conceptual models, fall short in this regard. This paper proposes five desiderata for explaining ViTs -- faithfulness, stability, sparsity, multi-level structure, and parsimony -- and demonstrates the inadequacy of current methods in meeting these criteria comprehensively. We introduce a variational Bayesian explanation framework, dubbed ProbAbilistic Concept Explainers (PACE), which models the distributions of patch embeddings to provide trustworthy post-hoc conceptual explanations. Our qualitative analysis reveals the distributions of patch-level concepts, elucidating the effectiveness of ViTs by modeling the joint distribution of patch embeddings and ViT's predictions. Moreover, these patch-level explanations bridge the gap between image-level and dataset-level explanations, thus completing the multi-level structure of PACE. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that PACE surpasses state-of-the-art methods in terms of the defined desiderata.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2406.12649

Code (1)

Wang-ML-Lab/interpretable-foundation-models 공식 구현 pytorch

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Automated Testing of LLM-Based Post Hoc Explainers Using Model Checking as an Oracle

2026-08-31 · Dennis Gross, Helge Spieker arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are used as post hoc explainers of sequential decision-making policies, producing natural-language explanations of why an action was chosen. However, LLMs often generate plausible but incorre…

Natural Language Queries

Helpful, Misleading or Confusing: How Humans Perceive Fundamental Building Blocks of Artificial Intelligence Explanations

2023-03-02 · Edward Small, Yueqing Xuan, Danula Hettiachchi, Kacper Sokol

Explainable artificial intelligence techniques are developed at breakneck speed, but suitable evaluation approaches lag behind. With explainers becoming increasingly complex and a lack of consensus on how to assess their…

Decision MakingExplainable artificial intelligence

ManifoldMind: Dynamic Hyperbolic Reasoning for Trustworthy Recommendations

2025-07-02 · Anoushka Harit, Zhongtian Sun, Suncica Hadzidedic arxiv

We introduce ManifoldMind, a probabilistic geometric recommender system for exploratory reasoning over semantic hierarchies in hyperbolic space. Unlike prior methods with fixed curvature and rigid embeddings, ManifoldMin…

Trusting the Explainers: Teacher Validation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Course Design

2022-12-17 · Vinitra Swamy, Sijia Du, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Deep learning models for learning analytics have become increasingly popular over the last few years; however, these approaches are still not widely adopted in real-world settings, likely due to a lack of trust and trans…

Explainable artificial intelligence

Analyzing Explainer Robustness via Probabilistic Lipschitzness of Prediction Functions

2022-06-24 · Zulqarnain Khan, Davin Hill, Aria Masoomi, Joshua Bone 외

Machine learning methods have significantly improved in their predictive capabilities, but at the same time they are becoming more complex and less transparent. As a result, explainers are often relied on to provide inte…

Prediction