ProCoT: Stimulating Critical Thinking and Writing of Students through Engagement with Large Language Models (LLMs)
We introduce a novel writing method called Probing Chain-of-Thought (ProCoT), which potentially prevents students from cheating using a Large Language Model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, while enhancing their active learning. LLMs have disrupted education and many other fields. For fear of students cheating, many have resorted to banning their use. These LLMs are also known for hallucinations. We conduct studies with ProCoT in two different courses with 65 students. The students in each course were asked to prompt an LLM of their choice with one question from a set of four and required to affirm or refute statements in the LLM output by using peer-reviewed references. The results show two things: (1) ProCoT stimulates creative/critical thinking and writing of students through engagement with LLMs when we compare the LLM-only output to ProCoT output and (2) ProCoT can prevent cheating because of clear limitations in existing LLMs, particularly ChatGPT, when we compare students' ProCoT output to LLM ProCoT output. We also discover that most students prefer to give answers in fewer words than LLMs, which are typically verbose. The average word counts for students in the first course, ChatGPT (v3.5), and Phind (v8) are 208, 391 and 383, respectively.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Active LearningLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Strategies for Creating Uncertainty in the AI Era to Trigger Students Critical Thinking: Pedagogical Design, Assessment Rubric, and Exam System
Generative AI challenges traditional assessments by allowing students to produce correct answers without demonstrating understanding or reasoning. Rather than prohibiting AI, this work argues that one way to integrate AI…
Profiles of AI Dependency: A Latent Class Analysis of Filipino Students' Academic Competencies
The increasing dependency among Filipino college students on artificial intelligence (AI) poses concerns about the potential decline of fundamental academic competencies. This study examines the extent of AI dependency a…
Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans
This intervention study investigates the use of counterarguments in writing for critical thinking by students in the context of Generative AI (GenAI). This is especially as risks of cheating and cognitive offloading exis…
Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a ubiquitous part of society, but a key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills to interact with machines e…
Generative AI in Collaborative Academic Report Writing: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Ethical Considerations
The availability and abundance of GenAI tools to administer tasks traditionally managed by people have raised concerns, particularly within the education and academic sectors, as some students may highly rely on these to…
HallucinationMisinformation