paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Random Parameter Noise Does Not Make Exact ReLU Verification Easy

2026-07-15 · Mojtaba Soltanalian arxiv

We study exact verification of ReLU networks in an adversarial smoothed model. Every network weight and bias is independently perturbed by Gaussian noise, clipped to $[-2,2]$, and rounded to the exact dyadic grid determined by the input bit complexity. We show that, under the standard assumption $\mathrm{NP}\not\subseteq\mathrm{BPP}$, there is no sound and complete verifier whose expected running time is polynomial in network size, bit complexity, and inverse noise level for every base instance. The conclusion already holds at the fixed noise level $σ_\star=2^{-11}$ for one-hidden-layer networks over a unit box, with hidden fan-in at most three and base coefficients in $[-1,1]$. The proof combines an exact gap embedding with a quantitative robustness argument. For every E3SAT formula $Φ$ with $m$ clauses, a four-ReLU-per-clause construction satisfies $\max_{x\in[0,1]^n} g_Φ(x)=(m-\operatorname{unsat}(Φ))/3$, and coordinatewise threshold rounding never decreases the objective. A weighted parameter-sensitivity inequality and Gaussian concentration then show that a verification gap linear in $m$ survives the aggregate perturbation of all coefficients with probability at least $1-e^{-m/8}$. The proof includes clipping, exact dyadic rounding, output-layer perturbations, polynomial-bit sampling of the rounded Gaussian law, and the conversion from expected smoothed running time to a BPP algorithm. Computational checks test the exact identity and illustrate the different scaling of extensive and constant gaps; they are diagnostics rather than evidence for the complexity theorem. The result concerns worst-case base networks in the stated absolute-noise model, but it shows that parameter nondegeneracy alone does not yield a universal smoothed-polynomial guarantee for exact verification.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.14375

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn?

2026-07-06 · Rodrigo Casado Noguerales, Bernhard Schölkopf, Thomas Hofmann, Aran Raoufi arxiv

What does a discrete diffusion model learn: a denoiser, a score ratio, or a bridge plug-in predictor? At the level of jump rates, these are one object in different coordinates, and reading a neural network in the wrong c…

Exact nuclear norm, completion and decomposition for random overcomplete tensors via degree-4 SOS

2020-11-18 · Bohdan Kivva, Aaron Potechin

In this paper we show that simple semidefinite programs inspired by degree $4$ SOS can exactly solve the tensor nuclear norm, tensor decomposition, and tensor completion problems on tensors with random asymmetric compone…

Tensor Decomposition

The Noise Collector for sparse recovery in high dimensions

2019-08-05 · Miguel Moscoso, Alexei Novikov, George Papanicolaou, Chrysoula Tsogka

The ability to detect sparse signals from noisy high-dimensional data is a top priority in modern science and engineering. A sparse solution of the linear system $A \rho = b_0$ can be found efficiently with an $l_1$-norm…

parameter estimationVocal Bursts Intensity Prediction

Advancing the Robustness of Large Language Models through Self-Denoised Smoothing

2024-04-18 · Jiabao Ji, Bairu Hou, Zhen Zhang, Guanhua Zhang 외

Although large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success, their vulnerability to adversarial perturbations, including recent jailbreak attacks, has raised considerable concerns. However, the increasing siz…

Muon with Nesterov Momentum: Heavy-Tailed Noise and (Randomized) Inexact Polar Decomposition

2026-05-07 · Sayantan Choudhury, Xiaoran Cheng, Martin Takáč, Sen Na 외 arxiv

Most first-order optimizers treat matrix-valued parameters as vectors, ignoring the intrinsic geometry of hidden-layer weights in neural networks. Muon addresses this mismatch by updating along the polar factor of a mome…