paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

RawlsGCN: Towards Rawlsian Difference Principle on Graph Convolutional Network

2022-02-28 · Jian Kang, Yan Zhu, Yinglong Xia, Jiebo Luo, Hanghang Tong

Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) plays pivotal roles in many real-world applications. Despite the successes of GCN deployment, GCN often exhibits performance disparity with respect to node degrees, resulting in worse predictive accuracy for low-degree nodes. We formulate the problem of mitigating the degree-related performance disparity in GCN from the perspective of the Rawlsian difference principle, which is originated from the theory of distributive justice. Mathematically, we aim to balance the utility between low-degree nodes and high-degree nodes while minimizing the task-specific loss. Specifically, we reveal the root cause of this degree-related unfairness by analyzing the gradients of weight matrices in GCN. Guided by the gradients of weight matrices, we further propose a pre-processing method RawlsGCN-Graph and an in-processing method RawlsGCN-Grad that achieves fair predictive accuracy in low-degree nodes without modification on the GCN architecture or introduction of additional parameters. Extensive experiments on real-world graphs demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed RawlsGCN methods in significantly reducing degree-related bias while retaining comparable overall performance.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2202.13547

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

GCN A Graph Convolutional Network, or GCN, is an approach for semi-supervised learning on graph-structured data. It is based on an efficient variant of [convolutional neural…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Exploring Rawlsian Fairness for K-Means Clustering

2022-05-04 · Stanley Simoes, Deepak P, Muiris MacCarthaigh

We conduct an exploratory study that looks at incorporating John Rawls' ideas on fairness into existing unsupervised machine learning algorithms. Our focus is on the task of clustering, specifically the k-means clusterin…

ClusteringFairness

Operationalising Rawlsian Ethics for Fairness in Norm-Learning Agents

2024-12-19 · Jessica Woodgate, Paul Marshall, Nirav Ajmeri

Social norms are standards of behaviour common in a society. However, when agents make decisions without considering how others are impacted, norms can emerge that lead to the subjugation of certain agents. We present RA…

Decision MakingEthicsFairness

Rawlsian Fair Adaptation of Deep Learning Classifiers

2021-05-31 · Kulin Shah, Pooja Gupta, Amit Deshpande, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya

Group-fairness in classification aims for equality of a predictive utility across different sensitive sub-populations, e.g., race or gender. Equality or near-equality constraints in group-fairness often worsen not only t…

Deep LearningFairness

Fair Machine Learning under Limited Demographically Labeled Data

2021-06-03 · Mustafa Safa Ozdayi, Murat Kantarcioglu, Rishabh Iyer

Research has shown that, machine learning models might inherit and propagate undesired social biases encoded in the data. To address this problem, fair training algorithms are developed. However, most algorithms assume w…

BIG-bench Machine LearningBilevel OptimizationFairness

From Utilitarian to Rawlsian Designs for Algorithmic Fairness

2023-02-07 · Daniel E. Rigobon

There is a lack of consensus within the literature as to how `fairness' of algorithmic systems can be measured, and different metrics can often be at odds. In this paper, we approach this task by drawing on the ethical f…

Fairness