Reason and Verify: A Framework for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet standard pipelines often lack mechanisms to verify inter- mediate reasoning, leaving them vulnerable to hallucinations in high-stakes domains. To address this, we propose a domain-specific RAG framework that integrates explicit rea- soning and faithfulness verification. Our architecture augments standard retrieval with neural query rewriting, BGE-based cross-encoder reranking, and a rationale generation module that grounds sub-claims in specific evidence spans. We further introduce an eight-category verification taxonomy that enables fine-grained assessment of rationale faithfulness, distinguishing between explicit and implicit support patterns to facilitate structured error diagnosis. We evaluate this framework on the BioASQ and PubMedQA benchmarks, specifically analyzing the impact of dynamic in-context learning and rerank- ing under constrained token budgets. Experiments demonstrate that explicit rationale generation improves accuracy over vanilla RAG baselines, while dynamic demonstration selection combined with robust reranking yields further gains in few-shot settings. Using Llama-3-8B-Instruct, our approach achieves 89.1% on BioASQ-Y/N and 73.0% on Pub- MedQA, competitive with systems using significantly larger models. Additionally, we perform a pilot study combining human expert assessment with LLM-based verification to explore how explicit rationale generation improves system transparency and enables more detailed diagnosis of retrieval failures in biomedical question answering.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Question AnsweringResults from the Paper
| Rank | Task | Dataset | Model | Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | Question Answering | BioASQ | Reason and Verify | Accuracy: 89.1 |
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Chain-of-Action: Faithful and Multimodal Question Answering through Large Language Models
We present a Chain-of-Action (CoA) framework for multimodal and retrieval-augmented Question-Answering (QA). Compared to the literature, CoA overcomes two major challenges of current QA applications: (i) unfaithful hallu…
HallucinationInformation RetrievalQuestion AnsweringRetrievalDoes Faithfulness-Guided Alignment Hurt Accuracy? Unlocking Accurate and Faithful Post-Retrieval Reasoning
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can achieve strong answer accuracy on multi-hop questions, but outcome-level rewards often leave reasoning traces weakly grounded and difficult to audit. Under noisy retrieval, models…
Multi-hop Question AnsweringReinforcement LearningResponse GenerationBeyond Correctness: Rewarding Faithful Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Inspired by the success of reinforcement learning (RL) in Large Language Model (LLM) training for domains like math and code, recent work has begun training LLMs to dynamically plan, query, and reason with search engines…
Reinforcement LearningExploring Knowledge Conflicts for Faithful LLM Reasoning: Benchmark and Method
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications especially when augmented by external knowledge through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Despite their widespread ado…
Knowledge GraphsKIRA: Knowledge-Intensive Image Retrieval and Reasoning Architecture for Specialized Visual Domains
Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) has transformed text based question answering, yet its extension to visual domains remains hindered by fundamental challenges: bridging the modality gap between image queries and text…
Question AnsweringVisual ReasoningImage Retrieval