paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Regression to the Tail: Why the Olympics Blow Up

2020-09-28 · Bent Flyvbjerg, Alexander Budzier, Daniel Lunn

The Olympic Games are the largest, highest-profile, and most expensive megaevent hosted by cities and nations. Average sports-related costs of hosting are $12.0 billion. Non-sports-related costs are typically several times that. Every Olympics since 1960 has run over budget, at an average of 172 percent in real terms, the highest overrun on record for any type of megaproject. The paper tests theoretical statistical distributions against empirical data for the costs of the Games, in order to explain the cost risks faced by host cities and nations. It is documented, for the first time, that cost and cost overrun for the Games follow a power-law distribution. Olympic costs are subject to infinite mean and variance, with dire consequences for predictability and planning. We name this phenomenon "regression to the tail": it is only a matter of time until a new extreme event occurs, with an overrun larger than the largest so far, and thus more disruptive and less plannable. The generative mechanism for the Olympic power law is identified as strong convexity prompted by six causal drivers: irreversibility, fixed deadlines, the Blank Check Syndrome, tight coupling, long planning horizons, and an Eternal Beginner Syndrome. The power law explains why the Games are so difficult to plan and manage successfully, and why cities and nations should think twice before bidding to host. Based on the power law, two heuristics are identified for better decision making on hosting. Finally, the paper develops measures for good practice in planning and managing the Games, including how to mitigate the extreme risks of the Olympic power law.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2009.14682

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Decision Makingregression

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

AI Olympics challenge with Evolutionary Soft Actor Critic

2024-09-02 · Marco Calì, Alberto Sinigaglia, Niccolò Turcato, Ruggero Carli 외

In the following report, we describe the solution we propose for the AI Olympics competition held at IROS 2024. Our solution is based on a Model-free Deep Reinforcement Learning approach combined with an evolutionary str…

Deep Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning

Why Do Language Model Agents Whistleblow?

2025-11-21 · Kushal Agrawal, Frank Xiao, Guido Bergman, Asa Cooper Stickland arxiv

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as tool-using agents causes their alignment training to manifest in new ways. Recent work finds that language models can use tools in ways that contradict the interests or e…

The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games

2016-07-14

Given that Olympic Games held over the past decade each have cost USD 8.9 billion on average, the size and financial risks of the Games warrant study. The objectives of the Oxford Olympics study are to (1) establish the …

Management

Imitation Learning Approach for AI Driving Olympics Trained on Real-world and Simulation Data Simultaneously

2020-07-07 · Mikita Sazanovich, Konstantin Chaika, Kirill Krinkin, Aleksei Shpilman

In this paper, we describe our winning approach to solving the Lane Following Challenge at the AI Driving Olympics Competition through imitation learning on a mixed set of simulation and real-world data. AI Driving Olymp…

Imitation Learning

Whistleblowing and the machine -- towards a considered position

2026-06-19 · Marija Slavkovik, Liuwen Yu, Leon van der Torre, Reka Markovich arxiv

Artificial intelligent agents and autonomous systems are embedded in our environments. They are both a commercial product and a personal tool that generates a lot of data and can draw conclusions from it: machines genera…