Resolving Language and Vision Ambiguities Together: Joint Segmentation & Prepositional Attachment Resolution in Captioned Scenes
We present an approach to simultaneously perform semantic segmentation and prepositional phrase attachment resolution for captioned images. Some ambiguities in language cannot be resolved without simultaneously reasoning about an associated image. If we consider the sentence "I shot an elephant in my pajamas", looking at language alone (and not using common sense), it is unclear if it is the person or the elephant wearing the pajamas or both. Our approach produces a diverse set of plausible hypotheses for both semantic segmentation and prepositional phrase attachment resolution that are then jointly reranked to select the most consistent pair. We show that our semantic segmentation and prepositional phrase attachment resolution modules have complementary strengths, and that joint reasoning produces more accurate results than any module operating in isolation. Multiple hypotheses are also shown to be crucial to improved multiple-module reasoning. Our vision and language approach significantly outperforms the Stanford Parser (De Marneffe et al., 2006) by 17.91% (28.69% relative) and 12.83% (25.28% relative) in two different experiments. We also make small improvements over DeepLab-CRF (Chen et al., 2015).
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Common Sense ReasoningPrepositional Phrase AttachmentSegmentationSemantic SegmentationSentenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Resolving Language and Vision Ambiguities Together: Joint Segmentation \& Prepositional Attachment Resolution in Captioned Scenes
Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions
In visual question answering (VQA) context, users often pose ambiguous questions to visual language models (VLMs) due to varying expression habits. Existing research addresses such ambiguities primarily by rephrasing que…
Visual Question AnsweringIs the Elephant Flying? Resolving Ambiguities in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Natural language often contains ambiguities that can lead to misinterpretation and miscommunication. While humans can handle ambiguities effectively by asking clarifying questions and/or relying on contextual cues and co…
Common Sense ReasoningDo Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguities
Spatial expressions in situated communication can be ambiguous, as their meanings vary depending on the frames of reference (FoR) adopted by speakers and listeners. While spatial language understanding and reasoning by v…
Spatial ReasoningVisually Guided Spatial Relation Extraction from Text
Extraction of spatial relations from sentences with complex/nesting relationships is very challenging as often needs resolving inherent semantic ambiguities. We seek help from visual modality to fill the information gap …
Activity RecognitionImage CaptioningImage RetrievalObject Localization+4