RLVR Training of LLMs Does Not Improve Thinking Ability for General QA: Evaluation Method and a Simple Solution
Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) stimulates the thinking processes of large language models (LLMs), substantially enhancing their reasoning abilities on verifiable tasks. It is often assumed that similar gains should transfer to general question answering (GQA), but this assumption has not been thoroughly validated. To assess whether RLVR automatically improves LLM performance on GQA, we propose a Cross-Generation evaluation framework that measures the quality of intermediate reasoning by feeding the generated thinking context into LLMs of varying capabilities. Our evaluation leads to a discouraging finding: the efficacy of the thinking process on GQA tasks is markedly lower than on verifiable tasks, suggesting that explicit training on GQA remains necessary in addition to training on verifiable tasks. We further observe that direct RL training on GQA is less effective than RLVR. Our hypothesis is that, whereas verifiable tasks demand robust logical chains to obtain high rewards, GQA tasks often admit shortcuts to high rewards without cultivating high-quality thinking. To avoid possible shortcuts, we introduce a simple method, Separated Thinking And Response Training (START), which first trains only the thinking process, using rewards defined on the final answer. We show that START improves both the quality of thinking and the final answer across several GQA benchmarks and RL algorithms.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningQuestion AnsweringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
OPSD Compresses What RLVR Teaches: A Post-RL Compaction Stage for Reasoning Models
On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has recently emerged as an alternative to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), promising higher accuracy and shorter responses through token-level credit assignment fr…
Reinforcement LearningMathematical ReasoningWell Begun, Half Done: Reinforcement Learning with Prefix Optimization for LLM Reasoning
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly enhances the reasoning capability of Large Language Models (LLMs). Current RLVR approaches typically conduct training across all generated tokens, but n…
Reinforcement LearningLSPO: Length-aware Dynamic Sampling for Policy Optimization in LLM Reasoning
Since the release of Deepseek-R1, reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a central approach for training large language models (LLMs) on reasoning tasks. Recent work has largely focused on modif…
Reinforcement LearningTimeLens: Rethinking Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs
This paper does not introduce a novel method but instead establishes a straightforward, incremental, yet essential baseline for video temporal grounding (VTG), a core capability in video understanding. While multimodal l…
Reinforcement LearningDoes Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently demonstrated notable success in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), particularly on mathematics and programming tasks. S…
MathVisual Reasoning