paper-with-me

Papers

S1-Bench: A Simple Benchmark for Evaluating System 1 Thinking Capability of Large Reasoning Models

2025-04-14 · Wenyuan Zhang, Shuaiyi Nie, Xinghua Zhang, Zefeng Zhang, Tingwen Liu

We introduce S1-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) on simple tasks that favor intuitive system 1 thinking rather than deliberative system 2 reasoning. While LRMs have achieved significant breakthroughs in complex reasoning tasks through explicit chains of thought, their heavy reliance on system 2 thinking may limit their system 1 thinking capabilities. However, there is a lack of an appropriate benchmark for evaluating LRM's system 1 thinking capabilities. To fill this gap, S1-Bench introduces a suite of simple, diverse, and natural questions across multiple domains and languages, specifically designed to assess LRMs' performance on questions more suitable for system 1 . We conduct extensive evaluations across 28 LRMs, revealing their inefficiency, inadequate accuracy, and limited robustness when handling simple questions. Additionally, we observe a gap between their difficulty perception and generation length. Overall, this work paves the way toward dual-system compatibility in the development of LRMs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.10368

Code (1)

wyripple/s1_bench 공식 구현

Tasks

Natural Questions

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

OptimalThinkingBench: Evaluating Over and Underthinking in LLMs

2025-08-18 · Pranjal Aggarwal, Seungone Kim, Jack Lanchantin, Sean Welleck 외 arxiv

Thinking LLMs solve complex tasks at the expense of increased compute and overthinking on simpler problems, while non-thinking LLMs are faster and cheaper but underthink on harder reasoning problems. This has led to the …

THINK-Bench: Evaluating Thinking Efficiency and Chain-of-Thought Quality of Large Reasoning Models

2025-05-28 · Zhiyuan Li, Yi Chang, Yuan Wu

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved impressive performance in complex tasks, often outperforming conventional large language models (LLMs). However, the prevalent issue of overthinking severely limits their compu…

Computational Efficiency

CresOWLve: Benchmarking Creative Problem-Solving Over Real-World Knowledge

2026-04-03 · Mete Ismayilzada, Renqing Cuomao, Daniil Yurshevich, Anna Sotnikova 외 arxiv

Creative problem-solving requires combining multiple cognitive abilities, including logical reasoning, lateral thinking, analogy-making, and commonsense knowledge, to discover insights that connect seemingly unrelated pi…

Logical Reasoning

TIR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Agentic Thinking-with-Images Reasoning

2025-11-03 · Ming Li, Jike Zhong, Shitian Zhao, Haoquan Zhang 외 arxiv

The frontier of visual reasoning is shifting toward models like OpenAI o3, which can intelligently create and operate tools to transform images for problem-solving, also known as thinking-\textit{with}-images in chain-of…

Visual Reasoning

AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise

2025-09-13 · Tara Bogavelli, Roshnee Sharma, Hari Subramani arxiv

While individual components of agentic architectures have been studied in isolation, there remains limited empirical understanding of how different design dimensions interact within complex multi-agent systems. This stud…