paper-with-me

Papers

Sebra: Debiasing Through Self-Guided Bias Ranking

2025-01-30 · Adarsh Kappiyath, Abhra Chaudhuri, Ajay Jaiswal, Ziquan Liu, Yunpeng Li, Xiatian Zhu, Lu Yin

Ranking samples by fine-grained estimates of spuriosity (the degree to which spurious cues are present) has recently been shown to significantly benefit bias mitigation, over the traditional binary biased-\textit{vs}-unbiased partitioning of train sets. However, this spuriosity ranking comes with the requirement of human supervision. In this paper, we propose a debiasing framework based on our novel \ul{Se}lf-Guided \ul{B}ias \ul{Ra}nking (\emph{Sebra}), that mitigates biases (spurious correlations) via an automatic ranking of data points by spuriosity within their respective classes. Sebra leverages a key local symmetry in Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) training -- the ease of learning a sample via ERM inversely correlates with its spuriousity; the fewer spurious correlations a sample exhibits, the harder it is to learn, and vice versa. However, globally across iterations, ERM tends to deviate from this symmetry. Sebra dynamically steers ERM to correct this deviation, facilitating the sequential learning of attributes in increasing order of difficulty, \ie, decreasing order of spuriosity. As a result, the sequence in which Sebra learns samples naturally provides spuriousity rankings. We use the resulting fine-grained bias characterization in a contrastive learning framework to mitigate biases from multiple sources. Extensive experiments show that Sebra consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art unsupervised debiasing techniques across multiple standard benchmarks, including UrbanCars, BAR, CelebA, and ImageNet-1K. Code, pre-trained models, and training logs are available at https://kadarsh22.github.io/sebra_iclr25/.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2501.18277

Code (1)

kadarsh22/Sebra 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Contrastive Learning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Contrastive Learning 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Causal-Guided Active Learning for Debiasing Large Language Models

2024-08-23 · Li Du, Zhouhao Sun, Xiao Ding, Yixuan Ma 외

Although achieving promising performance, recent analyses show that current generative large language models (LLMs) may still capture dataset biases and utilize them for generation, leading to poor generalizability and h…

Active LearningDiversityIn-Context Learning

Steering LLMs Towards Unbiased Responses: A Causality-Guided Debiasing Framework

2024-03-13 · Jingling Li, Zeyu Tang, Xiaoyu Liu, Peter Spirtes 외

Large language models (LLMs) can easily generate biased and discriminative responses. As LLMs tap into consequential decision-making (e.g., hiring and healthcare), it is of crucial importance to develop strategies to mit…

Decision Making

Intent-Aware Self-Correction for Mitigating Social Biases in Large Language Models

2025-03-08 · Panatchakorn Anantaprayoon, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki

Self-Correction based on feedback improves the output quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Moreover, as Self-Correction functions like the slow and conscious System-2 thinking from cognitive psychology's perspective,…

Response Generation

DebiasRAG: A Tuning-Free Path to Fair Generation in Large Language Models through Retrieval-Augmented Generation

2026-05-15 · Rui Chu, Bingyin Zhao, Thanh Quoc Hung Le, Duy Cao Hoang 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. However, because they depend on knowledge encapsulated from training corpora, they may produce hallucinat…

Prompt Engineering

Self-Debias: Self-correcting for Debiasing Large Language Models

2026-04-09 · Xuan Feng, Shuai Zhao, Luwei Xiao, Tianlong Gu 외 arxiv

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, inherent social biases often cascade throughout the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process, leading to continuous "Bias Propagation". Existing …