Secondary Stakeholders in AI: Fighting for, Brokering, and Navigating Agency
As AI technologies become more human-facing, there have been numerous calls to adapt participatory approaches to AI development -- spurring the idea of participatory AI. However, these calls often focus only on primary stakeholders, such as end-users, and not secondary stakeholders. This paper seeks to translate the ideals of participatory AI to a broader population of secondary AI stakeholders through semi-structured interviews. We theorize that meaningful participation involves three participatory ideals: (1) informedness, (2) consent, and (3) agency. We also explore how secondary stakeholders realize these ideals by traversing a complicated problem space. Like walking up the rungs of a ladder, these ideals build on one another. We introduce three stakeholder archetypes: the reluctant data contributor, the unsupported activist, and the well-intentioned practitioner, who must navigate systemic barriers to achieving agentic AI relationships. We envision an AI future where secondary stakeholders are able to meaningfully participate with the AI systems they influence and are influenced by.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
NavigateMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
SoftNash: Entropy-Regularized Nash Games for Non-Fighting Virtual Fixtures
Virtual fixtures (VFs) improve precision in teleoperation but often ``fight'' the user, inflating mental workload and eroding the sense of agency. We propose Soft-Nash Virtual Fixtures, a game-theoretic shared-control po…
Aspects of a Legal Framework for Language Resource Management
The management of language resources requires several legal aspects to be taken into consideration. In this paper we discuss a number of these aspects which lead towards the formation of a legal framework for a language …
ManagementStudying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use
As public sector agencies rapidly introduce new AI tools in high-stakes domains like social services, it becomes critical to understand how decisions to adopt these tools are made in practice. We borrow from the anthropo…
On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection
Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. Although machine learning models ca…
BIG-bench Machine LearningDeception DetectionMedical DiagnosisFrom Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering
Juniors enter as AI-natives, seniors adapted mid-career. AI is not just changing how engineers code-it is reshaping who holds agency across work and professional growth. We contribute junior-senior accounts on their usag…