paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Solve the Loop: Attractor Models for Language and Reasoning

2026-05-12 · Jacob Fein-Ashley, Paria Rashidinejad arxiv

Looped Transformers offer a promising alternative to purely feed-forward computation by iteratively refining latent representations, improving language modeling and reasoning. Yet recurrent architectures remain unstable to train, costly to optimize and deploy, and constrained to small, fixed recurrence depths. We introduce Attractor Models, in which a backbone module first proposes output embeddings, then an attractor module refines them by solving for the fixed point, with gradients obtained through implicit differentiation. Thus, training memory remains constant in effective depth, and iterations are chosen adaptively by convergence. Empirically, Attractor Models outperform existing models across two regimes, large-scale language-model pretraining and reasoning with tiny models. In language modeling, Attractor Models deliver a Pareto improvement over standard Transformers and stable looped models across sizes, improving perplexity by up to 46.6% and downstream accuracy by up to 19.7% while reducing training cost. Notably, a 770M Attractor Model outperforms a 1.3B Transformer trained on twice as many tokens. On challenging reasoning tasks, we show that our model with only 27M parameters and approximately 1000 examples achieves 91.4% accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 93.1% on Maze-Hard, scaling favorably where frontier models like Claude and GPT o3, fail completely, and specialized recursive reasoners collapse at larger sizes. Lastly, we show that Attractor Models exhibit a novel phenomenon, which we call equilibrium internalization: fixed-point training places the model's initial output embedding near equilibrium, allowing the solver to be removed at inference time with little degradation. Together, these results suggest that Attractor Models make iterative refinement scalable by turning recurrence into a computation the model can learn to internalize.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.12466

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Geometric Dynamics of Agentic Loops in Large Language Models

2025-12-11 · Nicolas Tacheny arxiv

Iterative LLM systems(self-refinement, chain-of-thought, autonomous agents) are increasingly deployed, yet their temporal dynamics remain uncharacterized. Prior work evaluates task performance at convergence but ignores …

Trajectory Forecasting

LoopViT: Scaling Visual ARC with Looped Transformers

2026-02-02 · Wen-Jie Shu, Xuerui Qiu, Rui-Jie Zhu, Harold Haodong Chen 외 arxiv

Recent advances in visual reasoning have leveraged vision transformers to tackle the ARC-AGI benchmark. However, we argue that the feed-forward architecture, where computational depth is strictly bound to parameter size,…

Visual Reasoning

Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformers

2025-02-24 · Nikunj Saunshi, Nishanth Dikkala, Zhiyuan Li, Sanjiv Kumar 외

Large language models have shown remarkable reasoning abilities and scaling laws suggest that large parameter count, especially along the depth axis, is the primary driver. In this work, we make a stronger claim -- many …

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMathMemorization

Reasoning as Attractor Dynamics: Latent Memory Retrieval via Gibbs-Weighted Energy Minimization

2026-06-23 · Kanishk Awadhiya arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally viewed as autoregressive generators. However, from the perspective of collective computation, they function as high-dimensional Dense Associative Memories that store complex…

Mathematical Reasoning

$A^3$-Bench: Benchmarking Memory-Driven Scientific Reasoning via Anchor and Attractor Activation

2026-01-14 · Jian Zhang, Yu He, Zhiyuan Wang, Zhangqi Wang 외 arxiv

Scientific reasoning relies not only on logical inference but also on activating prior knowledge and experiential structures. Memory can efficiently reuse knowledge and enhance reasoning consistency and stability. Howeve…