Spot The Bot: A Robust and Efficient Framework for the Evaluation of Conversational Dialogue Systems
The lack of time-efficient and reliable evaluation methods hamper the development of conversational dialogue systems (chatbots). Evaluations requiring humans to converse with chatbots are time and cost-intensive, put high cognitive demands on the human judges, and yield low-quality results. In this work, we introduce \emph{Spot The Bot}, a cost-efficient and robust evaluation framework that replaces human-bot conversations with conversations between bots. Human judges then only annotate for each entity in a conversation whether they think it is human or not (assuming there are humans participants in these conversations). These annotations then allow us to rank chatbots regarding their ability to mimic the conversational behavior of humans. Since we expect that all bots are eventually recognized as such, we incorporate a metric that measures which chatbot can uphold human-like behavior the longest, i.e., \emph{Survival Analysis}. This metric has the ability to correlate a bot's performance to certain of its characteristics (e.g., \ fluency or sensibleness), yielding interpretable results. The comparably low cost of our framework allows for frequent evaluations of chatbots during their evaluation cycle. We empirically validate our claims by applying \emph{Spot The Bot} to three domains, evaluating several state-of-the-art chatbots, and drawing comparisons to related work. The framework is released as a ready-to-use tool.
Code (1)
Tasks
ChatbotSurvival AnalysisMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems with Large Language Models: A User-Centric Evaluation Framework
Conversational recommender systems (CRS) involve both recommendation and dialogue tasks, which makes their evaluation a unique challenge. Although past research has analyzed various factors that may affect user satisfact…
Recommendation SystemsCoReflect: A Reflective Co-Evolution Framework for Improving Conversational Evaluation
Evaluating conversational systems in multi-turn settings remains a fundamental challenge. Conventional pipelines typically rely on manually defined rubrics and fixed conversational context$-$a static approach that limits…
clem:todd: A Framework for the Systematic Benchmarking of LLM-Based Task-Oriented Dialogue System Realisations
The emergence of instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) has advanced the field of dialogue systems, enabling both realistic user simulations and robust multi-turn conversational agents. However, existing research…
BenchmarkingTask-Oriented Dialogue SystemsTowards a Metric for Automated Conversational Dialogue System Evaluation and Improvement
We present "AutoJudge", an automated evaluation method for conversational dialogue systems. The method works by first generating dialogues based on self-talk, i.e. dialogue systems talking to itself. Then, it uses human …
Open-Ended Question AnsweringReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Re-RankingMeasuring Conversational Fluidity in Automated Dialogue Agents
We present an automated evaluation method to measure fluidity in conversational dialogue systems. The method combines various state of the art Natural Language tools into a classifier, and human ratings on these dialogue…