Stance Classification in Online Debates by Recognizing Users' Intentions
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationSentiment AnalysisStance ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Debating Europe: A Multilingual Multi-Target Stance Classification Dataset of Online Debates
We present a new dataset of online debates in English, annotated with stance. The dataset was scraped from the “Debating Europe” platform, where users exchange opinions over different subjects related to the European Uni…
Stance ClassificationXLM-R#Brexit: Leave or Remain? The Role of User's Community and Diachronic Evolution on Stance Detection
Interest has grown around the classification of stance that users assume within online debates in recent years. Stance has been usually addressed by considering users posts in isolation, while social studies highlight th…
ClassificationGeneral ClassificationStance DetectionStructured Representation Learning for Online Debate Stance Prediction
Online debates can help provide valuable information about various perspectives on a wide range of issues. However, understanding the stances expressed in these debates is a highly challenging task, which requires modeli…
General ClassificationPredictionRepresentation LearningFrom Perils to Possibilities: Understanding how Human (and AI) Biases affect Online Fora
Social media platforms are online fora where users engage in discussions, share content, and build connections. This review explores the dynamics of social interactions, user-generated contents, and biases within the con…
MisinformationHybrid Neural Attention for Agreement/Disagreement Inference in Online Debates
Inferring the agreement/disagreement relation in debates, especially in online debates, is one of the fundamental tasks in argumentation mining. The expressions of agreement/disagreement usually rely on argumentative exp…
Natural Language InferenceSentiment Analysis