Hybrid Neural Attention for Agreement/Disagreement Inference in Online Debates
Inferring the agreement/disagreement relation in debates, especially in online debates, is one of the fundamental tasks in argumentation mining. The expressions of agreement/disagreement usually rely on argumentative expressions in text as well as interactions between participants in debates. Previous works usually lack the capability of jointly modeling these two factors. To alleviate this problem, this paper proposes a hybrid neural attention model which combines self and cross attention mechanism to locate salient part from textual context and interaction between users. Experimental results on three (dis)agreement inference datasets show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art models.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Natural Language InferenceSentiment AnalysisSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?
Disagreements are common in online discussions. Disagreement may foster collaboration and improve the quality of a discussion under some conditions. Although there exist methods for recognizing disagreement, a deeper und…
Improving Agreement and Disagreement Identification in Online Discussions with A Socially-Tuned Sentiment Lexicon
We study the problem of agreement and disagreement detection in online discussions. An isotonic Conditional Random Fields (isotonic CRF) based sequential model is proposed to make predictions on sentence- or segment-leve…
SentenceJury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models
Whose labels should a machine learning (ML) algorithm learn to emulate? For ML tasks ranging from online comment toxicity to misinformation detection to medical diagnosis, different groups in society may have irreconcila…
BIG-bench Machine LearningMedical DiagnosisMisinformationInvestigating Reasons for Disagreement in Natural Language Inference
We investigate how disagreement in natural language inference (NLI) annotation arises. We developed a taxonomy of disagreement sources with 10 categories spanning 3 high-level classes. We found that some disagreements ar…
ClassificationNatural Language InferenceSentenceInherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences
We analyze human{'}s disagreements about the validity of natural language inferences. We show that, very often, disagreements are not dismissible as annotation {``}noise{''}, but rather persist as we collect more ratings…
Natural Language InferenceRTE