Staying VIGILant: Mitigating Visual Laziness via Counterfactual Visual Alignment in MLLMs
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) extend large language models (LLMs) with visual perception, enabling joint reasoning over images and text. Despite inheriting strong reasoning capabilities from LLMs, they remain prone to hallucinations that contradict their visual inputs. Mechanistic studies indicate that this weakness stems from visual laziness: MLLMs encode the correct visual evidence internally, but overly rely on strong language priors during response. Existing alignment methods, such as direct preference optimization, primarily optimize outcome-level rewards based on text. This introduces an optimization bias toward linguistic shortcuts, leading to responses that often contradict the visual evidence. To address this, we propose Visual Information Gain In aLignment (VIGIL), a reinforcement-learning (RL) post-training framework that shifts the focus from numerical reward fitting to causal visual grounding. VIGIL introduces a geometric constraint that explicitly maximizes the mutual information between the visual input and the generated response. We achieve this by penalizing "blind confidence" instances where the model remains improperly certain even when textual-visual attention is masked to create a counterfactual blind state. Extensive experiments show that VIGIL consistently outperforms recent alignment methods across hallucination and reasoning benchmarks without compromising text-only capabilities. Our approach matches the full-data performance of state-of-the-art methods using only 25% of the preference data and even demonstrates emergent spatial grounding capabilities without explicit bounding box supervision.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Visual GroundingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Difficult Task Yes but Simple Task No: Unveiling the Laziness in Multimodal LLMs
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate a strong understanding of the real world and can even handle complex tasks. However, they still fail on some straightforward visual question-answering (VQA) problems. …
Image DescriptionMultiple-choiceQuestion AnsweringVisual Question Answering+1Interpretability Needs a New Paradigm
Interpretability is the study of explaining models in understandable terms to humans. At present, interpretability is divided into two paradigms: the intrinsic paradigm, which believes that only models designed to be exp…
Visual Disentangled Diffusion Autoencoders: Scalable Counterfactual Generation for Foundation Models
Foundation models, despite their robust zero-shot capabilities, remain vulnerable to spurious correlations and 'Clever Hans' strategies. Existing mitigation methods often rely on unavailable group labels or computational…
Knowledge DistillationModality Laziness: Everybody's Business is Nobody's Business
Models fusing multiple modalities receive more information and can outperform their uni-modal counterparts. However, existing multi-modal training approaches often suffer from learning insufficient representations of eac…
What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
This paper presents a way of enhancing the reliability of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) in addressing hallucination, where the models generate cross-modal inconsistent responses. Without additional training, we propose…
counterfactualHallucinationScene Understanding