paper-with-me

Papers

Taming Imperfect Process Verifiers: A Sampling Perspective on Backtracking

2025-10-03 · Dhruv Rohatgi, Abhishek Shetty, Donya Saless, Yuchen Li, Ankur Moitra, Andrej Risteski, Dylan J. Foster arxiv

Test-time algorithms that combine the generative power of language models with process verifiers that assess the quality of partial generations offer a promising lever for eliciting new reasoning capabilities, but the algorithmic design space and computational scaling properties of such approaches are still opaque, and their benefits are far from apparent when one accounts for the cost of learning a high-quality verifier. Our starting point is the observation that seemingly benign errors in a learned verifier can lead to catastrophic failures for standard decoding techniques due to error amplification during the course of generation. We then ask: can this be improved with more sophisticated decoding strategies? We introduce a new process-guided test-time sampling algorithm, VGB, which uses theoretically grounded backtracking to achieve provably better robustness to verifier errors. VGB interprets autoregressive generation as a random walk on a tree of partial generations, with transition probabilities guided by the process verifier and base model; crucially, backtracking occurs probabilistically. This process generalizes the seminal Sinclair-Jerrum random walk (Sinclair & Jerrum, 1989) from the literature on approximate counting and sampling in theoretical computer science, and a conceptual contribution of our work is to highlight parallels with this literature. Empirically, we demonstrate on both synthetic and real language modeling tasks that VGB outperforms baselines on a variety of metrics.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.03149

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Improving Value-based Process Verifier via Structural Prior Injection

2025-02-21 · Zetian Sun, Dongfang Li, Baotian Hu, Jun Yu 외

In the Large Language Model(LLM) reasoning scenario, people often estimate state value via Monte Carlo sampling. Though Monte Carlo estimation is an elegant method with less inductive bias, noise and errors are inevitabl…

Inductive BiasLarge Language Model

Aggregating LLM-Based Weak Verifiers for Spatial Layout Generation

2026-06-03 · Sharon Zhang, R. Kenny Jones, Jiajun Wu, Maneesh Agrawala arxiv

We present a pipeline for building and aggregating task-specific, LLM-generated weak (imperfect) verifiers into a strong verifier for spatial layout domains. Given a task description, our pipeline asks an LLM to synthesi…

Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifiers

2025-06-22 · Jon Saad-Falcon, E. Kelly Buchanan, Mayee F. Chen, Tzu-Heng Huang 외

Verifiers can improve language model capabilities by scoring and ranking responses from generated candidates. Currently, high-quality verifiers are either unscalable (e.g., humans) or limited in utility (e.g., tools like…

Math

Inference Scaling fLaws: The Limits of LLM Resampling with Imperfect Verifiers

2024-11-26 · Benedikt Stroebl, Sayash Kapoor, Arvind Narayanan

Recent research has generated hope that inference scaling could allow weaker language models to match or exceed the accuracy of stronger models, such as by repeatedly sampling solutions to a coding problem until it passe…

HumanEvalmbpp

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable yet Noisy Rewards under Imperfect Verifiers

2025-10-01 · Xin-Qiang Cai, Wei Wang, Feng Liu, Tongliang Liu 외 arxiv

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) replaces costly human labeling with automated verifiers. To reduce verifier hacking, many RLVR systems binarize rewards to $\{0,1\}$, but imperfect verifiers inevitab…

Reinforcement Learning