paper-with-me

Papers

Test Where Decisions Matter: Importance-driven Testing for Deep Reinforcement Learning

2024-11-12 · Stefan Pranger, Hana Chockler, Martin Tappler, Bettina Könighofer

In many Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems, decisions in a trained policy vary in significance for the expected safety and performance of the policy. Since RL policies are very complex, testing efforts should concentrate on states in which the agent's decisions have the highest impact on the expected outcome. In this paper, we propose a novel model-based method to rigorously compute a ranking of state importance across the entire state space. We then focus our testing efforts on the highest-ranked states. In this paper, we focus on testing for safety. However, the proposed methods can be easily adapted to test for performance. In each iteration, our testing framework computes optimistic and pessimistic safety estimates. These estimates provide lower and upper bounds on the expected outcomes of the policy execution across all modeled states in the state space. Our approach divides the state space into safe and unsafe regions upon convergence, providing clear insights into the policy's weaknesses. Two important properties characterize our approach. (1) Optimal Test-Case Selection: At any time in the testing process, our approach evaluates the policy in the states that are most critical for safety. (2) Guaranteed Safety: Our approach can provide formal verification guarantees over the entire state space by sampling only a fraction of the policy. Any safety properties assured by the pessimistic estimate are formally proven to hold for the policy. We provide a detailed evaluation of our framework on several examples, showing that our method discovers unsafe policy behavior with low testing effort.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2411.07700

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Deep Reinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approach

2020-01-21 · Carlos Fernández-Loría, Foster Provost, Xintian Han

We examine counterfactual explanations for explaining the decisions made by model-based AI systems. The counterfactual approach we consider defines an explanation as a set of the system's data inputs that causally drives…

counterfactualFeature Importance

Robust Data-Driven Decisions Under Model Uncertainty

2022-05-09 · Xiaoyu Cheng

When sample data are governed by an unknown sequence of independent but possibly non-identical distributions, the data-generating process (DGP) in general cannot be perfectly identified from the data. For making decision…

model

Perception Matters: Enhancing Embodied AI with Uncertainty-Aware Semantic Segmentation

2024-08-05 · Sai Prasanna, Daniel Honerkamp, Kshitij Sirohi, Tim Welschehold 외

Embodied AI has made significant progress acting in unexplored environments. However, tasks such as object search have largely focused on efficient policy learning. In this work, we identify several gaps in current searc…

Semantic Segmentation

Conditional Visual Evidence Utility: State-Dependent Rank Reversals in Frozen Vision-Language Encoders

2026-08-28 · Yunxuan Fang, Xinhe Wang arxiv

Static importance scores compress visual evidence into a single ranking, but the value of remaining evidence can change after one cue has been observed. We study this possibility in controlled compositional visual search…

Calibrating Where It Matters: Constrained Temperature Scaling

2024-06-17 · Stephen McKenna, Jacob Carse

We consider calibration of convolutional classifiers for diagnostic decision making. Clinical decision makers can use calibrated classifiers to minimise expected costs given their own cost function. Such functions are us…

Decision MakingDiagnostic