paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Conference Paper Assignment Problem: Using Order Weighted Averages to Assign Indivisible Goods

2017-05-19 · Jing Wu Lian, Nicholas Mattei, Renee Noble, Toby Walsh

Motivated by the common academic problem of allocating papers to referees for conference reviewing we propose a novel mechanism for solving the assignment problem when we have a two sided matching problem with preferences from one side (the agents/reviewers) over the other side (the objects/papers) and both sides have capacity constraints. The assignment problem is a fundamental problem in both computer science and economics with application in many areas including task and resource allocation. We draw inspiration from multi-criteria decision making and voting and use order weighted averages (OWAs) to propose a novel and flexible class of algorithms for the assignment problem. We show an algorithm for finding a $\Sigma$-OWA assignment in polynomial time, in contrast to the NP-hardness of finding an egalitarian assignment. Inspired by this setting we observe an interesting connection between our model and the classic proportional multi-winner election problem in social choice.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1705.06840

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Decision Making

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design

2021-08-13 · Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu, Fei Fang 외

Many scientific conferences employ a two-phase paper review process, where some papers are assigned additional reviewers after the initial reviews are submitted. Many conferences also design and run experiments on their …

Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments

2020-06-29 · NeurIPS 2020 12 · Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu, Nihar B. Shah 외

We consider three important challenges in conference peer review: (i) reviewers maliciously attempting to get assigned to certain papers to provide positive reviews, possibly as part of quid-pro-quo arrangements with the…

Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise

2022-01-25 · Komal Dhull, Steven Jecmen, Pravesh Kothari, Nihar B. Shah

Strategic behavior is a fundamental problem in a variety of real-world applications that require some form of peer assessment, such as peer grading of homeworks, grant proposal review, conference peer review of scientifi…

No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning

2023-03-25 · Thorsten Eisenhofer, Erwin Quiring, Jonas Möller, Doreen Riepel 외

The number of papers submitted to academic conferences is steadily rising in many scientific disciplines. To handle this growth, systems for automatic paper-reviewer assignments are increasingly used during the reviewing…

Topic Models

On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding

2024-02-12 · Steven Jecmen, Nihar B. Shah, Fei Fang, Leman Akoglu

A major threat to the peer-review systems of computer science conferences is the existence of "collusion rings" between reviewers. In such collusion rings, reviewers who have also submitted their own papers to the confer…

Fraud Detectiontext similarity