paper-with-me

Papers

The Objective Is the Bottleneck: Latent World Models Encode What Their Planners Cannot Use

2026-08-13 · Joyjeet Singh arxiv

Latent world models are judged by how well they predict, so when planning fails at long horizons the natural reading is that the predictor degrades. On a reproduction of LeWorldModel on TwoRoom we show the binding constraint is the planner's objective instead. The predictor is not the limit: its imagined state seventy-five environment steps ahead is still only 0.189 as wrong as assuming the world froze, while the planner never imagines beyond twenty-five. The objective is. Cross-entropy-method planning minimises squared latent distance, which tracks true distance at r = 0.426, saturates by about eighty arena units and decreases beyond a hundred and twenty, so moving away from the goal can lower the cost. The information is present throughout: a ridge probe recovers position from the frozen embedding at R^2 0.9922. The pathology is the method's, not one reimplementation's. It is present in the authors' released weights, and across four checkpoints long-horizon success rank-orders exactly with metric quality and inversely with prediction accuracy. Replacing only the objective, with nothing retrained and no GPU, lifts goals reached at offset 100 from 26.0% to 98.0%, equals the 98.0% at offset 25, and reaches 92.0% under a third of the budget: planning stops depending on the horizon. The best cost is not the most accurate. A head learned from frame separation alone predicts spatial distance worse than a position probe (r = 0.819 against 0.9897) yet plans better, charging 24% more to cross the environment's dividing wall where squared latent distance charges 4% less. It has learned reachability, not proximity.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2608.12959

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models

2026-08-18 · Jack Boylan, Chris Hokamp arxiv

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) learn world models by predicting future embeddings, but the objective admits a trivial solution of a constant encoder, so every practical system adds an anti-collapse mech…

SynLaD: Latent Diffusion for Generating Synthesizable Molecules Conditioned on 3D Pharmacophore Profiles

2026-07-01 · Miruna Cretu, John Bradshaw, Patricia Suriana, Saeed Saremi 외 arxiv

We present SynLaD, a latent diffusion framework for small-molecule generation that unifies ligand-based drug design objectives (what to make) with synthetic accessibility (how to make it). Current models typically optimi…

Are We Using Autoencoders in a Wrong Way?

2023-09-04 · Gabriele Martino, Davide Moroni, Massimo Martinelli

Autoencoders are certainly among the most studied and used Deep Learning models: the idea behind them is to train a model in order to reconstruct the same input data. The peculiarity of these models is to compress the in…

Anomaly DetectionClassificationDenoisingDimensionality Reduction

Why Self-Supervised Encoders Want to Be Normal

2026-04-30 · Yuval Domb arxiv

Self-supervised learning has achieved remarkable empirical success in learning robust representations without explicit labels, most recently demonstrated within the framework of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (…

Self-Supervised Learning

Pixel-level Scene Understanding in One Token: Visual States Need What-is-Where Composition

2026-03-14 · Seokmin Lee, Yunghee Lee, Byeonghyun Pak, Byeongju Woo arxiv

For robotic agents operating in dynamic environments, learning visual state representations from streaming video observations is essential for sequential decision making. Recent self-supervised learning methods have show…

Self-Supervised LearningRepresentation LearningScene UnderstandingDecision Making