Towards Formal Definitions of Blameworthiness, Intention, and Moral Responsibility
We provide formal definitions of degree of blameworthiness and intention relative to an epistemic state (a probability over causal models and a utility function on outcomes). These, together with a definition of actual causality, provide the key ingredients for moral responsibility judgments. We show that these definitions give insight into commonsense intuitions in a variety of puzzling cases from the literature.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Learning Tractable Probabilistic Models for Moral Responsibility and Blame
Moral responsibility is a major concern in autonomous systems, with applications ranging from self-driving cars to kidney exchanges. Although there have been recent attempts to formalise responsibility and blame, among s…
Decision MakingManagementMoral ScenariosSelf-Driving CarsBlameworthiness in Multi-Agent Settings
We provide a formal definition of blameworthiness in settings where multiple agents can collaborate to avoid a negative outcome. We first provide a method for ascribing blameworthiness to groups relative to an epistemic …
Why Sampling Is Not Choosing: Intentionality, Agency, and Moral Responsibility in Large Language Models
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have prompted claims that such systems exhibit agency or qualify as moral agents. This paper argues that these attributions are misguided. We maintain that moral responsibi…
Responsible AI and Its Stakeholders
Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) proposes a framework that holds all stakeholders involved in the development of AI to be responsible for their systems. It, however, fails to accommodate the possibility of holdin…
AllSelf-LearningBlameworthiness in Strategic Games
There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of this paper is on the blameworthiness defined through the principle of alternative possibilities: a coalition is blamable for a statement if the state…