VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, they often fail on tasks that require fine-grained visual perception, even when the required information is still present in their internal representations. Prior work has attributed this ``hidden-in-plain-sight'' gap to the language model, but the cause remains unexplained. In this work, we demonstrate that this gap arises from the language model's lack of semantic labels for fine-grained visual details: when visual entities can be mapped to known concepts, VLMs bypass visual comparison and reason through language; when they cannot, VLMs resort to brittle and hallucinated descriptions. We verify this across semantic correspondence, synthetic shape matching, and face matching, and find that VLMs perform much better when the relevant entities are nameable than when they are unnamable. Mechanistically, Logit Lens analysis confirms that VLMs explicitly recover semantic labels for nameable entities and surface more unique tokens compared to unnameable entities. Furthermore, we show that this limitation can be addressed: teaching completely arbitrary names for unknown entities improves performance. More importantly, task-specific finetuning yields even stronger generalization without relying on language priors, i.e. through real visual perception. Our findings suggest that current VLM failures on visual tasks reflect a learned shortcut rather than a fundamental limitation of multimodal reasoning.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Semantic correspondenceMultimodal ReasoningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts
We present LoCoVQA, a dynamic benchmark generator for evaluating long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs). LoCoVQA augments test examples for mathematical reasoning, VQA, and character recogniti…
Mathematical ReasoningVisual Question Answering (VQA)Read or Ignore? A Unified Benchmark for Typographic-Attack Robustness and Text Recognition in Vision-Language Models
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are vulnerable to typographic attacks, where misleading text within an image overrides visual understanding. Existing evaluation protocols and defenses, largely focused on object reco…
Visual Question AnsweringObject RecognitionThink Before You Act: A Two-Stage Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias Towards Vision-Language Tasks
Gender bias in vision-language models (VLMs) can reinforce harmful stereotypes and discrimination. In this paper, we focus on mitigating gender bias towards vision-language tasks. We identify object hallucination as the …
HallucinationObject HallucinationWords or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel in integrating visual and textual information for vision-centric tasks, but their handling of inconsistencies between modalities is underexplored. We investigate VLMs' modality prefere…
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingText AugmentationReal Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery
Visual inputs are often assumed to improve language understanding in multimodal models. We examine this assumption by asking whether vision-language models (VLMs) can distinguish useful visual evidence from incidental im…