paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Who Followed the Blueprint? Analyzing the Responses of U.S. Federal Agencies to the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights

2024-04-29 · Darren Lage, Riley Pruitt, Jason Ross Arnold

This study examines the extent to which U.S. federal agencies responded to and implemented the principles outlined in the White House's October 2022 "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights." The Blueprint provided a framework for the ethical governance of artificial intelligence systems, organized around five core principles: safety and effectiveness, protection against algorithmic discrimination, data privacy, notice and explanation about AI systems, and human alternatives and fallback. Through an analysis of publicly available records across 15 federal departments, the authors found limited evidence that the Blueprint directly influenced agency actions after its release. Only five departments explicitly mentioned the Blueprint, while 12 took steps aligned with one or more of its principles. However, much of this work appeared to have precedents predating the Blueprint or motivations disconnected from it, such as compliance with prior executive orders on trustworthy AI. Departments' activities often emphasized priorities like safety, accountability and transparency that overlapped with Blueprint principles, but did not necessarily stem from it. The authors conclude that the non-binding Blueprint seems to have had minimal impact on shaping the U.S. government's approach to ethical AI governance in its first year. Factors like public concerns after high-profile AI releases and obligations to follow direct executive orders likely carried more influence over federal agencies. More rigorous study would be needed to definitively assess the Blueprint's effects within the federal bureaucracy and broader society.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2404.19076

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

One Bad NOFO? AI Governance in Federal Grantmaking

2025-05-13 · Dan Bateyko, Karen Levy

Much scholarship considers how U.S. federal agencies govern artificial intelligence (AI) through rulemaking and their own internal use policies. But agencies have an overlooked AI governance role: setting discretionary g…

Large Language Models Can Be a Viable Substitute for Expert Political Surveys When a Shock Disrupts Traditional Measurement Approaches

2025-06-06 · Patrick Y. Wu

After a disruptive event or shock, such as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) federal layoffs of 2025, expert judgments are colored by knowledge of the outcome. This can make it difficult or impossible to rec…

Position

A Semantic Framework for Enabling Radio Spectrum Policy Management and Evaluation

2020-11-08 · H. Santos, A. Mulvehill, J. S. Erickson, J. P. McCusker 외

Because radio spectrum is a finite resource, its usage and sharing is regulated by government agencies. These agencies define policies to manage spectrum allocation and assignment across multiple organizations, systems, …

Management

When Models Disagree: Rethinking LLM Evaluation for Public Comment Analysis

2026-05-27 · Aisha Najera, Alvin Moon, Vedant Srinivasan, Rajesh Veeraraghavan arxiv

Federal agencies are deploying large language models (LLMs) to categorize public comment corpora, where the model's organization of the record shapes what policymakers see and which arguments register. Standard evaluatio…

Visualizing changes to US federal environmental agency websites, 2016–2020

2021-02-25 · PLOS ONE 2021 2 · Eric Nost, Gretchen Gehrke, Grace Poudrier, Aaron Lemelin 외

Websites have become the primary means by which the US federal government communicates about its operations and presents information for public consumption. However, the alteration or removal of critical information from…

Data Visualization