Why Are Some Emotions Harder for LLMs? Uncovering the Causal Mechanisms of Emotion Inference via Sparse Autoencoders
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in emotionally sensitive human-AI applications, where reliable emotion detection is essential. However, their emotion recognition abilities remain uneven: models often perform well on some emotions while consistently struggling with others. Although recent work has explored emotion mechanisms in LLMs, little is known about why models are weaker on some emotions than others from a mechanistic interpretability perspective. In this work, we investigate emotion-specific biases through the causal mechanisms of emotion inference using sparse autoencoders (SAEs). We systematically identify causal sparse emotion features that drive emotion inference and analyze their sparse causal organization within and across emotions. We show that some emotions, such as surprise and fear, rely on highly concentrated feature sets, whereas disgust exhibits a more distributed sparse causal organization: its causal features are generally weaker, frequently co-activate with features for other emotions, and are often overshadowed by causal features for anger. These representational differences provide a mechanistic explanation for why LLMs struggle more with certain emotions. Finally, we conduct two intervention experiments: targeted steering of weaker causal features to mitigate emotion-specific failures, and global optimization of a steering vector over the identified causal features to improve overall emotion recognition performance.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Emotion RecognitionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Uncovering the Limits of Text-based Emotion Detection
Identifying emotions from text is crucial for a variety of real world tasks. We consider the two largest now-available corpora for emotion classification: GoEmotions, with 58k messages labelled by readers, and Vent, with…
Emotion ClassificationEmotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Model
Large language models (LLMs) sometimes appear to exhibit emotional reactions. We investigate why this is the case in Claude Sonnet 4.5 and explore implications for alignment-relevant behavior. We find internal representa…
Uncovering Hidden Correctness in LLM Causal Reasoning via Symbolic Verification
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being applied to tasks that involve causal reasoning. However, current benchmarks often rely on string matching or surface-level metrics that do not capture whether the outpu…
LLM4GRN: Discovering Causal Gene Regulatory Networks with LLMs -- Evaluation through Synthetic Data Generation
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) represent the causal relationships between transcription factors (TFs) and target genes in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Understanding these networks is crucial for uncoveri…
Synthetic Data GenerationTowards LLM-guided Causal Explainability for Black-box Text Classifiers
With the advent of larger and more complex deep learning models, such as in Natural Language Processing (NLP), model qualities like explainability and interpretability, albeit highly desirable, are becoming harder challe…
counterfactualCounterfactual ExplanationExplanation GenerationInstruction Following+4