Why Does RLAIF Work At All?
Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) enables language models to improve by training on their own preference judgments, yet no theoretical account explains why this self-improvement seemingly works for value learning. We propose the latent value hypothesis, that pretraining on internet-scale data encodes human values as directions in representation space, and constitutional prompts elicit these latent values into preference judgments. We formalize this intuition under a linear model where the constitution acts as a projection operator selecting value-relevant directions. Our analysis yields several results. RLAIF improves alignment when the constitution-activated direction correlates with true values better than the model's default generation direction thus explaining the generation-judgment gap; the ceiling on RLAIF quality is determined by how well representations encode values, which scales with model capacity; and adversarial constitutions exist that can activate anti-social value directions encoded from harmful pretraining data. Our account unifies scattered empirical findings including the refusal direction, low-rank safety subspaces, and RLAIF scaling behavior.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedback
This paper presents Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (MORLAIF), a novel approach to improving the alignment and performance of language models trained using reinforcement learning from AI feedback …
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMulti-Objective Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learning+1Oracle-RLAIF: An Improved Fine-Tuning Framework for Multi-modal Video Models using Reinforcement Learning from Ranking Feedback
Recent advances in large video-language models (VLMs) rely on extensive fine-tuning techniques that strengthen alignment between textual and visual comprehension. Leading pipelines typically pair supervised fine-tuning (…
Reinforcement LearningRLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, but gathering high-quality preference labels is expensive. RL from AI Feedback (RLAI…
Dialogue Generationreinforcement-learningHRLAIF: Improvements in Helpfulness and Harmlessness in Open-domain Reinforcement Learning From AI Feedback
Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) has the advantages of shorter annotation cycles and lower costs over Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), making it highly efficient during the rapid strategy…
Language ModellingLarge Language ModelRed Teamingreinforcement-learning+2RLAIF-V: Open-Source AI Feedback Leads to Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness
Traditional feedback learning for hallucination reduction relies on labor-intensive manual labeling or expensive proprietary models. This leaves the community without foundational knowledge about how to build high-qualit…
HallucinationImage CaptioningObject HallucinationVisual Question Answering