Why Does Surprisal From Smaller GPT-2 Models Provide Better Fit to Human Reading Times?
This work presents an in-depth analysis of an observation that contradicts the findings of recent work in computational psycholinguistics, namely that smaller GPT-2 models that show higher test perplexity nonetheless generate surprisal estimates that are more predictive of human reading times. Analysis of the surprisal values shows that rare proper nouns, which are typically tokenized into multiple subword tokens, are systematically assigned lower surprisal values by the larger GPT-2 models. A comparison of residual errors from regression models fit to reading times reveals that regression models with surprisal predictors from smaller GPT-2 models have significantly lower mean absolute errors on words that are tokenized into multiple tokens, while this trend is not observed on words that are kept intact. These results indicate that the ability of larger GPT-2 models to predict internal pieces of rare words more accurately makes their surprisal estimates deviate from humanlike expectations that manifest in self-paced reading times and eye-gaze durations.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
regressionMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions?
We investigate the extent to which word surprisal can be used to predict a neural measure of human language processing difficulty - the N400. To do this, we use recurrent neural networks to calculate the surprisal of sti…
How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions?
We investigate the extent to which word surprisal can be used to predict a neural measure of human language processing difficulty{---}the N400. To do this, we use recurrent neural networks to calculate the surprisal of s…
Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokens
Recent psycholinguistic studies have drawn conflicting conclusions about the relationship between the quality of a language model and the ability of its surprisal estimates to predict human reading times, which has been …
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingSurprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)
Surprisal theory holds that the human processing difficulty of a linguistic unit in context is an affine function of its surprisal under some language model. I argue this claim is a tautology without further constraint: …
Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times -- but does it do so for the "right reasons"?
A wide body of evidence shows that human language processing difficulty is predicted by the information-theoretic measure surprisal, a word's negative log probability in context. However, it is still unclear how to best …
Language ModellingLarge Language Model