paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Wu's Method can Boost Symbolic AI to Rival Silver Medalists and AlphaGeometry to Outperform Gold Medalists at IMO Geometry

2024-04-09 · Shiven Sinha, Ameya Prabhu, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Siddharth Bhat, Matthias Bethge

Proving geometric theorems constitutes a hallmark of visual reasoning combining both intuitive and logical skills. Therefore, automated theorem proving of Olympiad-level geometry problems is considered a notable milestone in human-level automated reasoning. The introduction of AlphaGeometry, a neuro-symbolic model trained with 100 million synthetic samples, marked a major breakthrough. It solved 25 of 30 International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) problems whereas the reported baseline based on Wu's method solved only ten. In this note, we revisit the IMO-AG-30 Challenge introduced with AlphaGeometry, and find that Wu's method is surprisingly strong. Wu's method alone can solve 15 problems, and some of them are not solved by any of the other methods. This leads to two key findings: (i) Combining Wu's method with the classic synthetic methods of deductive databases and angle, ratio, and distance chasing solves 21 out of 30 methods by just using a CPU-only laptop with a time limit of 5 minutes per problem. Essentially, this classic method solves just 4 problems less than AlphaGeometry and establishes the first fully symbolic baseline strong enough to rival the performance of an IMO silver medalist. (ii) Wu's method even solves 2 of the 5 problems that AlphaGeometry failed to solve. Thus, by combining AlphaGeometry with Wu's method we set a new state-of-the-art for automated theorem proving on IMO-AG-30, solving 27 out of 30 problems, the first AI method which outperforms an IMO gold medalist.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2404.06405

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Automated Theorem ProvingCPUVisual Reasoning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2

2025-02-05 · Yuri Chervonyi, Trieu H. Trinh, Miroslav Olšák, Xiaomeng Yang 외

We present AlphaGeometry2, a significantly improved version of AlphaGeometry introduced in Trinh et al. (2024), which has now surpassed an average gold medalist in solving Olympiad geometry problems. To achieve this, we …

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingMathSynthetic Data Generation

Newclid: A User-Friendly Replacement for AlphaGeometry

2024-11-18 · Vladmir Sicca, Tianxiang Xia, Mathïs Fédérico, Philip John Gorinski 외

We introduce a new symbolic solver for geometry, called Newclid, which is based on AlphaGeometry. Newclid contains a symbolic solver called DDARN (derived from DDAR-Newclid), which is a significant refactoring and upgrad…

Achieving Olympiad-Level Geometry Large Language Model Agent via Complexity Boosting Reinforcement Learning

2025-12-11 · Haiteng Zhao, Junhao Shen, Yiming Zhang, Songyang Gao 외 arxiv

Large language model (LLM) agents exhibit strong mathematical problem-solving abilities and can even solve International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) level problems with the assistance of formal proof systems. However, du…

Reinforcement Learning

NL2AGBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Formalization for AlphaGeometry

2026-08-28 · Samuel Xiao, Judy Song, Rory Hu, Ziliang Zong arxiv

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in natural language understanding and mathematical reasoning. However, their ability to translate informal mathematical problems into …

Natural Language UnderstandingMathematical Reasoning

The Topological Dual of a Dataset: A Logic-to-Topology Encoding for AlphaGeometry-Style Data

2026-04-20 · Anthony Bordg arxiv

AlphaGeometry represents a milestone in neuro-symbolic reasoning, yet its architecture faces a log-linear scaling bottleneck within its symbolic deduction engine that limits its efficiency as problem complexity increases…

Formal Logic