A Comprehensive Evaluation framework of Alignment Techniques for LLMs
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, ensuring their outputs align with human values and safety standards has become critical. The field has developed diverse alignment approaches including traditional fine-tuning methods (RLHF, instruction tuning), post-hoc correction systems, and inference-time interventions, each with distinct advantages and limitations. However, the lack of unified evaluation frameworks makes it difficult to systematically compare these paradigms and guide deployment decisions. This paper introduces a multi-dimensional evaluation of alignment techniques for LLMs, a comprehensive evaluation framework that provides a systematic comparison across all major alignment paradigms. Our framework assesses methods along four key dimensions: alignment detection, alignment quality, computational efficiency, and robustness. Through experiments across diverse base models and alignment strategies, we demonstrate the utility of our framework in identifying strengths and limitations of current state-of-the-art models, providing valuable insights for future research directions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Computational EfficiencySimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Pluralistic Behavior Suite: Stress-Testing Multi-Turn Adherence to Custom Behavioral Policies
Large language models (LLMs) are typically aligned to a universal set of safety and usage principles intended for broad public acceptability. Yet, real-world applications of LLMs often take place within organizational ec…
Quantifying CBRN Risk in Frontier Models
Frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) pose unprecedented dual-use risks through the potential proliferation of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons knowledge. We present the first comprehensive …
Prompt EngineeringA Systematic Evaluation of Preference Aggregation in Federated RLHF for Pluralistic Alignment of LLMs
This paper addresses the challenge of aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse human preferences within federated learning (FL) environments, where standard methods often fail to adequately represent diverse vi…
Federated LearningA Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their transition to real-world applications reveals a critical limitation: the inability to adapt to individual preferences while maintaining al…
ManagementSurveyThe Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models
Natural-language assistants are designed to provide users with helpful responses while avoiding harmful outputs, largely achieved through alignment to human preferences. Yet there is limited understanding of whether alig…